First-Line Irinotecan Effective in Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 8 No 6
Volume 8
Issue 6

ASCO-The addition of irinotecan, also known as CPT-11 (Camptosar), to standard first-line therapy significantly increased progression-free survival and antitumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, according to the preliminary results of a randomized, open-label phase III trial presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Irinotecan is currently FDA approved for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

ASCO—The addition of irinotecan, also known as CPT-11 (Camptosar), to standard first-line therapy significantly increased progression-free survival and antitumor response in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, according to the preliminary results of a randomized, open-label phase III trial presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). Irinotecan is currently FDA approved for second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer.

At 6 months after the start of treatment, combination therapy with irino-tecan prevented tumor growth in 52% of patients treated, compared with 35% of those given standard therapy alone—ie, fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin—reported Leonard B. Saltz, MD, of the Gastrointestinal Oncology Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.

Median progression-free survival was 6.9 months in the triple-therapy arm vs 4.4 months for standard therapy (P = .001) and 4.2 months for irinotecan alone. Adding irinotecan to standard therapy also significantly increased the overall response rate: 51% vs 29%.

The 667 eligible study patients were randomized to one of three regimens: (1) irinotecan, 125 mg/m² weekly for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest, each irinotecan dose to be followed by leucovorin, 20 mg/m², and 5-FU, 500 mg/m² IV bolus, all drugs given weekly for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off; (2) the standard Mayo Clinic regimen of leucovorin, 20 mg/m², and 5-FU, 425 mg/m², given daily for 5 days repeated every 4 weeks; or (3) irinotecan, 125 mg/m², given weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks.

Overall survival was not significantly different between the two key arms in the trial—14.4 months for the irinotecan-containing combination and 12.6 months for the Mayo Clinic regimen at a median follow-up of approximately 12 months. Dr. Saltz pointed out, however, that a possible survival trend in favor of the irinotecan combination appeared at 18 months.

Toxicities in the triple-agent arm were predictable and manageable, occurring with a similar frequency and severity as with standard therapy. Furthermore, irinotecan had no detrimental impact on quality of life.

“This CPT-11/5-FU/leucovorin bolus regimen can be considered a new standard treatment option for the first-line therapy of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer,” Dr. Saltz commented. “Evaluation of this combination regimen as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer is now under way.”

European Study

Preliminary results of an international phase III study presented at ASCO corroborated the results of the US trial. In the 387-patient trial, reported by Jean-Yves Douillard, MD, PhD, of Centre René-Gauducheau, Nantes, France, progression-free survival was 8.2 vs 4.3 months, and tumor response rates were 39% vs 22% in the triple combination (irinotecan, 5-FU, folinic acid) and standard therapy arms, respectively.

Median survival was 14 months in the 5-FU/leucovorin arm vs 17 months in the irinotecan combination arm—“a clear survival benefit,” Dr. Douillard said.

Recent Videos
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.