Frontline Immunotherapy/Bevacizumab Ups PFS in PD-L1–Positive mRCC

Video

This video examines a phase II study that compared atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab vs sunitinib in untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

In this video, David F. McDermott, MD, of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, discusses a phase II study (IMmotion 150) that compared the anti–PD-L1 agent atezolizumab with or without bevacizumab vs sunitinib in untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).

With a median follow-up of 20.7 months, results of the study showed a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.7 months in PD-L1–positive mRCC patients who received atezolizumab/bevacizumab vs 7.8 months in patients on sunitinib alone (hazard ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.38–1.08).

McDermott highlights interesting findings from the study, including patients who achieved complete responses, and notable adverse events from the combination regimen.

The study (abstract 431) was presented at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, held February 16–18 in Orlando, Florida.

Recent Videos
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
More follow-up data will better elucidate the impact of frontline use of hypomethylating agents in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
2 experts in this video
Related Content