Gefitinib Lung Cancer Trial Terminated Early

Article

A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant gefitinib in patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was closed early, but available results suggest that the drug is unlikely to benefit this group of patients.

A randomized phase III trial of adjuvant gefitinib in patients with completely resected non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was closed early, but available results suggest that the drug is unlikely to benefit this group of patients.

The study (NCIC CTG BR19) was undertaken due to the generally poor survival of patients with completely resected NSCLC along with some evidence of activity with gefitinib in advanced NSCLC. Once accrual of the study was ongoing, however, results from two other trials showed no benefit with gefitinib in a similar disease setting; because of those results, this trial was closed early and final results were analyzed after all patients already included were followed for at least 4 years. Led by Glenwood D. Goss, MD, of the Ottawa Hospital Cancer Center, results of the study were published online ahead of print in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

In total, 503 patients out of a planned 1,242 were included. All patients had completely resected NSCLC and were randomized to either placebo (252 patients) or gefitinib (251 patients) 250 mg/day for 2 years. The median follow-up was 4.7 years; three patients were lost to follow-up.

There was no difference with regard to overall survival; the median overall survival on gefitinib was 5.1 years, and it had not been reached for placebo patients, yielding a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.24 (95% CI, 0.94–1.64; P = 0.14). A Cox regression model found age of at least 65 years and tumor size of at least 4 cm to be associated with shorter overall survival, but gefitinib was not significantly associated with survival (though it was “potentially harmful”).

Similarly, median disease-free survival was 4.2 years in gefitinib patients and it was not reached for placebo patients; the HR for recurrence was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.93–1.61; P = 0.15). Only larger tumor size was significantly associated with shorter disease-free survival, while gefitinib had no significant associations and could have been harmful.

EGFR mutation status was available in 359 tumors, and only 15 patients were found to have mutations. There were still no differences for disease-free survival and overall survival in patients stratified by EGFR mutation status.

Toxicity, as expected, was greater in patients who received gefitinib. Those patients had a higher incidence of various adverse events including rash, diarrhea, and dry skin, though they had lower incidence of chest pain, muscle pain, and dyspnea. The patient refusal or withdrawal rate after the start of therapy was 24% in the gefitinib group and 7% in the placebo patients.

“Unfortunately early termination of the study does not allow for statistically robust conclusions,” the authors wrote. Still, the relatively large sample size and balanced study arms led them to note that gefitinib is unlikely to be of benefit in this population of patients.

Recent Videos
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.
According to Jorge Nieva, MD, there are a multitude of things that can be explored to enhance the treatment landscape for lung cancer.
In a CancerNetwork® YouTube video, Cornelia Tischmacher, a mother of twins from Germany, outlined her receipt of double lung transplantation.
Related Content