Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin Plus Chemo Improves Outcomes in Pediatric KMT2A-Rearranged AML

News
Article

Pediatric patients with KMT2A-rearranged acute myeloid leukemia who were treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin plus standard chemotherapy experienced improved event-free survival and a reduced relapsed risk.

Treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin and standard chemotherapy yielded improved outcomes for pediatric patients with KMT2A-rearranged (KMT2A-r) acute myeloid leukemia (AML), according to results from the phase 3 children’s oncology group trial AAML0531 (NCT01407757) that was published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology; consolidation therapy with hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSTCT) may yield even better outcomes, investigators said.

At 5 years, the event-free survival (EFS) from study entry was 38% and the overall survival (OS) was 58%. When patients were treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin had a 5-year EFS 48% compared with 29% in the non–gemtuzumab ozogamicin group (P = .003). However, OS was comparable with 63% in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group and 53% in the control group (P = .054). A lower relapse risk was seen in 40% of patients who were treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin compared with 66% of patients who did not receive gemtuzumab ozogamicin (P = .001). An improved 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of 57% was reported among patients in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group compared with 33% of patients in the non-gemtuzumab ozogamicin group (P = .002).

A total of 1022 patients were enrolled, 21% of whom had KMT2A-r AML. Patients with KMT2A-r were younger and less likely to have clinically relevant co-occurring mutations compared with KMT2A wild-type patients who were more likely to have cytogenic complexity and non-central nervous system extramedullary disease.

The multivariate analysis comparing the KMT2A-r and KMT2A wild-type disease arms, treatment arms, and corresponding interaction term showed a significant interaction term for EFS (P = .022) and DFS (P = .020). This indicates that gemtuzumab ozogamicin may have different treatment effects on the KMT2A wild-type and KMT2A-r AML for EFS and DFS, but not for OS (P = .119) and relapse risk (P = .066).

Patients with KMT2A-r had a higher rate of EOI1 morphologic complete remission after being treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (77%) compared with those treated without gemtuzumab ozogamicin (64%; P = .035). Additionally, those treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin in the KMT2A-r and KMT2A wild-type arms had comparable outcomes regardless of gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure. Patients with HR translocations who were treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin had a better EFS (27%; 95% CI, 14%-41%) compared with those who were not treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin (6%; 95% CI, 1%-18%; P = .013).

The non-HR subset (n = 107) saw an improved EFS of 66% (95% CI, 51%-77%) after being treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin compared with 42% in those who did not receive gemtuzumab ozogamicin (95% CI, 29%-55%; P = .017). Additionally, DFS was 75% in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin group (95% CI, 59%-86%) compared with 50% in the non-gemtuzumab ozogamicin group (95% CI, 32%-65%; P = .025), and relapse risk was 22% in the gemtuzumab ozogamicin cohort (95% CI, 11%-36%) compared with 47% in the control cohort (95% CI, 29%-63%; P = .026).

Among the 215 patients with KTMT2A-r, 14% received HSTCT in the first CR, 63% of whom received gemtuzumab ozogamicin during the first induction. Patients who had previous gemtuzumab ozogamicin exposure and had received HSCT had a DFS of 72% (95% CI, 45%-87%) compared with 27% (95% CI, 7%-54%) for patients in the non-gemtuzumab ozogamicin group (P = .004). Additionally, patients saw a reduction in relapse risk when receiving gemtuzumab ozogamicin and HSTCT vs the control group (28%; 95% CI, 10%-50% vs 73%; 95% CI, 32%-91%; P = .006).

Reference

Pollard JA, Guest E, Alonzo TA, et al. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin improves event-free survival and reduces relapse in pdiatric KMT2A-rearranged AML: results from the phase III children's oncology group trial AAML0531. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(28):3149-3160. doi:10.1200/JCO.20.03048

Recent Videos
Both clinicians and patients should have as much information as possible to participate in shared decision-making for CLL care, says Jacob D. Soumerai, MD.
Sequencing different treatments in the first 3 lines of therapy represents a challenge in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, according to Deborah Stephens, DO.
Compared with second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, asciminib was better tolerated in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia.
Bulkiness of disease did not appear to impact PFS outcomes with ibrutinib plus venetoclax in the phase 2 CAPTIVATE study.
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML
A panel of 3 experts on CML