GPS Immunization for Multiple Myeloma Is Well Tolerated

Article

Among high-risk multiple myeloma patients, post-ASCT immunization with the Wilms tumor 1 peptide mixture galinpepimut-S is well tolerated and is associated with promising progression-free survival.

Among high-risk patients with multiple myeloma, post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) immunization with the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) peptide mixture galinpepimut-S (GPS) is well-tolerated and is associated with a “promising” progression-free survival (PFS), according to initial findings from a phase I/II open-label study presented at the 2017 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, held June 2–6 in Chicago (abstract 8016).

“Administration of the novel WT1 heteroclitic peptide immunizer GPS in multiple myeloma patients post-ASCT demonstrates encouraging median PFS (currently 23.6 months), therapeutic response, and a favorable safety profile in this high-risk MM population with historically poor long-term outcomes,” reported Guenther Koehne, MD, PhD, and colleagues, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York. “This ‘off-the-shelf’ immunotherapeutic is easy to administer and has been specifically designed to elicit responses across most common HLA class I and II alleles.”

Nineteen patients were enrolled. Fifteen (79%) had high-risk cytogenetics at diagnosis.

Participants received the first dose of subcutaneous GPS immunization with Montanide adjuvant within 22 days of ASCT, followed by biweekly doses to a total of six doses. A booster dose was delivered every 4 weeks to a total of six booster doses. Granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factory was administered 2 days before and at each GPS dose. Lenalidomide (10 mg once daily) maintenance therapy was initiated 3 months after ASCT in all but one patient, who underwent bortezomib maintenance instead.

WT1-specific “CD8+ and CD4+ immune responses could be detected at various levels in all but two patients following GPS administration,” the authors reported. “These immune responses were induced not only against the heteroclitic peptides (within GPS), but also were detected against the corresponding native WT1 peptide sequences that are expressed on malignant plasma cells, as well as the ‘total pool’ of WT1-derived overlapping peptides.”

After a median follow-up of 18 months, the median overall survival in this population has not been reached. Overall survival and PFS rates were 88% (95% CI, 73–99) and 62% (95% CI, 42–92), respectively.

A phase II trial is being planned, they reported. It will “optimally integrate post-transplant immunotherapeutic strategies” with the goal of delaying relapse.

The study was funded by the Leo A. Guthart and Kathryn Medina Research Fund in Multiple Myeloma, and Sellas Life Sciences Group. One coauthor disclosed a consulting relationship with Sellas Life Sciences Group.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content