Healthcare legislation boosts future of cancer care services

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 19 No 4
Volume 19
Issue 4

Oncology fared well under the new healthcare reform legislation without cuts to the core businesses of medical oncology, radiation oncology, office-administered drugs, and PET/PET-CT imaging.

BALTIMORE-Oncology fared well under the new healthcare reform legislation without cuts to the core businesses of medical oncology, radiation oncology, office-administered drugs, and PET/PET-CT imaging, according to a presenter at the 2010 Association of Community Cancer Centers meeting.

The new legislation will spend $940 billion over ten years to expand private insurance coverage and expand the privately insured patient population including those who require cancer care, said Matt Brow, vice president of government relations and public policy for US Oncology, based in the Woodlands, Tex.

Mr. Brow pointed out some of the provisions that directly affect oncology care:

Practices can voluntarily participate in accountable care organizations (ACOs) that will manage and coordinate care across settings. Lower cost or the use of equally effective regimens will be rewarded. ACOs can consist of physician groups, networks of physician groups, and joint ventures between a hospital and physicians.
The CMS Innovation Center, a testing ground for new payment models, will align nationally recognized, evidence-based guidelines of cancer care with Medicare payment incentives for treatment planning and follow-up care for Medicare beneficiaries.
Insurance company coverage of routine costs associated with participation in a clinical trial, which may increase trial participation.
New fees on medical device manufacturers such as higher costs for such equipment as linear accelerators.

Source: "Healthcare Reform: How Does Oncology Fare?,"

www.accc-cancer.org

Recent Videos
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Related Content