How SBRT Has Evolved Over the Decades to Manage Kidney Cancer

Video

An expert from the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas gives an overview of the multimodal use of stereotactic radiation for the treatment of patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

During the 2022 Society for Urologic Oncology (SUO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Raquibul Hannan, MD, PhD, a professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology, Urology and Immunology at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas about how the use of stereotactic radiation has been adapted for the treatment of patients with metastatic kidney cancer.

Hannan highlighted stereotactic radiation’s original purpose of managing brain and spinal metastases in the palliative setting before describing some of the challenges involved in delivering radiation doses to patients. He, however, said that using stereotactic radiation was a collaborative effort between urologists and neurosurgeons.

“[Stereotactic radiation] is always done in the multimodality setting where we work with the neurosurgeons, and if they’re able to resect, they will resect it first, and we come in with stereotactic radiation in the postoperative setting,” he said.

Transcript:

So, in the palliative setting, the brain metastases [are] actually where stereotactic radiation therapy originated. Back even as early as the late 90s and early 2000s, we have seen very good control rates. The control rates are close to 100% for some of these brain metastases. For spine metastasis, [it is] a little bit more challenging because the spinal cord is right there. And that limits our ability to deliver a high ablative radiation dose to give local control. But it's always done in the multimodality setting where we work with the neurosurgeons, and if they're able to resect, they will resect it first, and we come in with stereotactic radiation in the postoperative setting.

Recent Videos
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Improving data collection and biomarker development across institutions may represent areas of expansion in kidney cancer research.
KIM-1 is a biomarker in the blood that may help noninvasively detect kidney cancer, according to Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD.
A phase 0 trial is seeking to assess the feasibility of aiding anti-cancer cells with cytokines to restore their function.
Related Content