Immediate Hormonal Therapy vs Observation in Node-Positive Prostate Cancer

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 2
Volume 14
Issue 2

Immediate antiandrogen therapy after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves survival and reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with node-positive prostate cancer, according to a study published in the December 9, 1999,

Immediate antiandrogen therapy after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves survival and reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with node-positive prostate cancer, according to a study published in the December 9, 1999, issue of The New England Journal of Medicine. The optimal time to initiate treatment remains unresolved in advanced prostate cancer; however, current clinical practice often involves waiting for recurrence before further treatment is initiated. This trial, conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, compared immediate vs delayed treatment in patients with minimal residual disease.

The trial enrolled 98 men who were found to have nodal metastases after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The men were randomized to receive immediate antiandrogen therapy with either goserelin (Zoladex) or bilateral orchiectomy or to be followed until disease progressed.

Study Results

After a median of 7.1 years of follow-up, 7 of 47 men in the immediate antiandrogen group had died, as compared with 18 of 51 in the observation group (P = .02). At last follow-up, 36 men in the immediate-therapy group (77%) and 9 men in the observation group (18%) were alive and had no evidence of recurrent disease.

Investigators concluded that immediate antiandrogen therapy after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves survival and reduces the risk of recurrence in patients with node-positive prostate cancer. However, although these results suggest an advantage for early androgen deprivation therapy, further trials are needed to confirm these findings.

This trial was supported, in part, by Public Health Service grants from the National Cancer Society, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Health and Human Services. Investigators included Edward M. Messing, MD, the University of Rochester Medical Center (lead investigator); Judith Manola, MS, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Michael Sarosdy, MD, the University of Texas; George Wilding, MD, University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center; E. David Crawford, MD, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center; and Donald Trump, MD, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.

Recent Videos
Immunotherapy-based combinations may elicit a synergistic effect that surpasses monotherapy outcomes among patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Hosts Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS, and Benjamin Garmezy, MD, discuss presentations at ESMO 2025 that may impact bladder, kidney, and prostate cancer care.
Biochemical markers and advanced imaging modalities play a critical role in monitoring patients undergoing RLT therapy for metastatic prostate cancer.
Data support the use of radioligand therapy in combination with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors to optimize prostate cancer outcomes.
Experts weigh in on tumor-informed testing, false positives, relevant trial data, and other key concepts related to circulating tumor DNA.
Ongoing studies in kidney cancer aim to explore determinants of immune-related adverse effects and strategies for mitigating them.
Machine learning-based approaches may play a role in further understanding of how somatic alterations influence responses or resistance to therapy.
Data from a first-in-disease trial assessing a personalized cancer vaccine in RCC require validation at a larger level, according to David Braun, MD, PhD.
Related Content