IMRT vs Proton Therapy in Esophageal Cancer

Video

This video reviews the advantages and disadvantages of IMRT and proton therapy for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

The current standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer is 3D radiation, but newer technologies such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and proton therapy have shown the ability to reduce toxicity by limiting radiation to the surrounding tissue.

In this video, Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, reviews IMRT and proton therapy, discussing some of the advantages and disadvantages.

Recent Videos
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Related Content