Integrating Psycho-Oncology Specialists Into Multidisciplinary Cancer Care

News
Video

It is crucial that oncologists and other cancer care specialists collaborate with psycho-oncology specialists to optimize patient treatment outcomes.

According to Cristiane Decat Bergerot, PhD, BS, MS, psychosocial care and support have a significant impact on a patient’s experience during cancer treatment, as well as the outcome of their therapy.

Bergerot, a psychologist, the head of supportive care at Grupo Oncoclinicas in Brazil, and a member of the International Psycho-Oncology Society, stated that addressing the distress a patient is under can improve many facets of treatment such as adherence, communication, and quality of life.

She also emphasized the importance of good collaboration between oncologists and cancer care specialists with psycho-oncology specialists. Ways to optimize this partnership include utilizing distress screenings, improving communications, and spreading proper education and training.

Following the announcement of the inaugural World Psycho-Oncology Day on April 9, 2025, CancerNetwork® interviewed Bergerot.

Transcript:

Working in psycho-oncology has reinforced the profound impact that psychosocial support has on a patient’s experience and treatment outcomes. I have seen, firsthand, how addressing emotional distress can improve adherence to cancer treatments, enhance communication between patients and their healthcare teams, and with the symptom burden. For example, patients who receive psychological support often report greater resilience, better pain management, and improved quality of life. Furthermore, psycho-oncology interventions help caregivers by reducing their burden and improving their capacity to provide care. We know that the growing recognition of psycho-oncology as a core component of cancer care has been incredibly rewarding, as it validates the importance of treating the patient as a whole.

The collaboration [between oncologists and psycho-oncology specialists] is key to optimizing treatment outcomes. We can use several strategies to enhance this partnership, such as implementing systematic distress screenings during oncology visits to help identify patients who would benefit from psychosocial support, integrating care models to ensure seamless referrals and timely interventions, improving interdisciplinary communications, and providing education and training to recognize this distress early and refer patients appropriately.

Reference

World Psycho-Oncology Day (WPOD). IPOS. Accessed April 2, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/43c9rr2c

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Related Content