Irinotecan/Docetaxel Combination Has Potential in Recurrent Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 9 No 11
Volume 9
Issue 11

ROCHESTER, Minnesota-The combination of irinotecan (Camptosar)and docetaxel (Taxotere) is a promising treatment for recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the dosing schedule tested in phase I and II trials needs to be modified to reduce the potential for myelosuppression and diarrhea, cautioned Alex Adjei, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

ROCHESTER, Minnesota—The combination of irinotecan (Camptosar)and docetaxel (Taxotere) is a promising treatment for recurrent non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the dosing schedule tested in phase I and II trials needs to be modified to reduce the potential for myelosuppression and diarrhea, cautioned Alex Adjei, MD, of the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Phase I Study

Irinotecan and docetaxel are novel cytotoxic drugs that have broad antitumor activity as single agents but different mechanisms of cytotoxicity, Dr. Adjei commented. Irinotecan inhibits DNA topoisomerase I and docetaxel interferes with microtubule disassembly.

In the phase I study, four escalating dose levels (150/50 mg/m², 160/65 mg/m², 200/65 mg/m², and 200/75 mg/m²) of irinotecan/docetaxel were tested in 18 patients with solid tumors.

Neutropenia was the most common and dose-limiting toxicity, and thrombocytopenia was rare. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity, although there was no grade 3 or 4 diarrhea in patients who received maximal doses of antidiarrheal agents.

Clinical activity was seen at all dose levels. Overall, there were 7 partial responses in 18 patients. Three of five patients with previously treated stage IV NSCLC had durable partial responses. There was no clinically significant pharmacokinetic interaction between the two drugs.

Phase II Study

Dr. Adjei presented toxicity data from a phase II trial in which patients received irinotecan 160 mg/m², intravenously over 90 minutes, followed by docetaxel 65 mg/m² intravenously over 60 minutes. The regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles.

As of August 31, 2000, 25 patients had been enrolled. Fifteen were evaluable for toxicity. Response and survival data are not yet available.

Neutropenia was the predominant toxicity, with severe neutropenia occurring among 57% of the patients. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity. Roughly one third of patients developed severe diarrhea, about 20% reported fatigue, about 13% complained of nausea, and 13% developed severe anemia. There were no cases of severe thrombocytopenia.

“Based on our findings, we believe the dose defined in phase I studies is too toxic for community use.” Because of the toxicities encountered in the initial patients, the drug doses used in this ongoing study have been amended to irinotecan 130 mg/m², and docetaxel 50 mg/m², Dr. Adjei said.

The phase II trial included NSCLC patients who had undergone one prior chemotherapy regimen, who had stable disease for at least 4 weeks while on prior chemotherapy, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 1. Patients who had 25% or more of their bone marrow irradiated, patients who had undergone prior treatment with either of the two study drugs, and patients who had grade 2 or worse peripheral neuropathy were excluded.

The median age of the study population was 62 years. Fourteen patients had a performance status of 0, and 11 had a performance status of 1. Thirteen patients had undergone prior treatment with paclitaxel (Taxol), and the median duration of their prior response to chemotherapy was 7 months.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.