Jeffrey Wolf, MD, on Findings From a Study Investigating Therapy Changes Using MRD in Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Video

Wolf discussed the decisions to change therapy based on the MRD status of patients with multiple myeloma.

Jeffrey Wolf, MD, of the University of California San Francisco, discussed with CancerNetwork® the results from his presentation “Making Clinical Decisions to Change Therapy Using Measurable Residual Disease Improves the Outcome in Multiple Myeloma” at the 2020 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting & Exposition.

Transcription:

What we did in this study is we looked at 373 patients, both in San Francisco and in Spain. In 58 cases, we found that we had to change our therapy because of what we discovered. In some cases, it was because the patient had 0 malignant cells that we could measure for MRD; and in 3 cases, we decided not to even take them to a bone marrow transplant, which is sort of standard, because we felt we had gotten a deep enough response. In other cases, we found 0 malignant cells out of a million and decided that we could stop the maintenance therapy they were on. In still others, we found that by measuring [the MRD] sequentially, we could say that the therapy they were on wasn’t effective and either stop it or stop it and initiate some other therapy that could result in a better, lower MRD.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content