Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, Discusses Previous Results of the AO41202 Trial Examining Ibrutinib Regimens in CLL

News
Video

Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, spoke about the phase 3 AO41202 study, which investigated different ibrutinib regimens for elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

During the 2021 American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting, Jennifer A. Woyach, MD, associate professor in the Division of Hematology at The Ohio State University, discussed previously reported results of the phase 3 AO41202 study (NCT01886872), which looked to treat patients over 65 years of age who had not received prior therapy with ibrutinib (Imbruvica) regimens or chemoimmunotherapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Woyach discusses prior results in anticipation of updated data that will be presented at the meeting.

Transcript:

The AO41202 study is a National Clinical Trials Network [NCTN]-sponsored phase 3 trial led by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. In this study, we looked at the optimal care of older patients with previously untreated CLL. This study is for patients who are age 65 or older who had not received prior CLL therapy. We randomized them 1:1:1 for treatment with bendamustine plus rituximab, or ibrutinib given alone or ibrutinib given in combination with rituximab. The primary results of the study showed that either regimen containing ibrutinib showed superior progression-free survival to bendamustine and rituximab, and there was no difference between the 2 ibrutinib containing regimens.

Reference

Woyach JA, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA, et al. Ibrutinib regimens versus chemoimmunotherapy in older patients with untreated CLL. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(26):2517-2528. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1812836

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content