Jonathan Spicer, MD, PhD, Discusses Multidisciplinary Communication for Treating Resectable NSCLC With Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Video
Conference|ASCO Annual Meeting: Lung Cancer

CancerNetwork® sat down with Jonathan Spicer, MD, PhD, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting to talk about how communication across a multidisciplinary team was necessary to the success of neoadjuvant immunotherapy administration in CheckMate 816.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Jonathan Spicer, MD, PhD, of McGill University in Montreal, Canada, regarding multidisciplinary communication during the phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial (NCT02998528). As a leader, he spoke about how being forced to work with practitioners outside of his department helped the entire center become stronger.

CheckMate 816 focused on patients with resectable non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab (Opdivo) plus ipilimumab (Yervoy), nivolumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone with results supporting the use of nivolumab/chemotherapy as a potential neoadjuvant treatment in this setting.

Transcript:

When we first opened CheckMate 816, McGill University Health Center worked essentially on 2 main hospital sites, there’s Montreal General Hospital and the Royal Victoria Hospital. The Cancer Center is down at the Royal Victoria and Montreal General is where the surgery is done. We all work together but going through this trial was a real team building exercise. I think it brought all members of the team—medical oncologists, surgeons, pulmonologists—to get adequate staging biopsies [and] the interpretation of the resected specimen pathologically. It’s been a huge learning experience for pathologists and we’ve all had to communicate a lot about that and the care of these patients. I think we’ve all learned an enormous amount and it’s made us become a much more tightly knit team, which has been extremely positive. I’m grateful for that opportunity, because [as the] one leading this effort at McGill, it’s been really good for our team.

Reference

Spicer J, Wang C, Tanaka F, et al. Surgical outcomes from the phase 3 CheckMate 816 trial: Nivolumab (NIVO) + platinum-doublet chemotherapy (chemo) vs chemo alone as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):8503. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8503

Recent Videos
Although 1 of 21 patients with liver-dominant NETs died due to RILD in the phase 1 study, no RILD-induced deaths were observed in the phase 2 trial.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
A simulation procedure helped to ascertain chemotherapy tolerability before administering radioembolization therapy for NETs with liver metastases.
The addition of radioembolization to radiosensitizing chemotherapy may help concurrently treat patients with liver tumors and disease outside the liver.
In neuroendocrine tumor management, patients with insulinoma may be at risk of severe hypoglycemia following receipt of GLP-1 receptor agonists.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.
212Pb-DOTAMTATE showed “unexpectedly good” outcomes among those with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, said Mary Maluccio, MD, MPH, FACS.
Trials at scale can be conducted in middle-income, low-middle-income, and even lower-income countries if you organize a trial ecosystem.
Related Content
Biomarker analyses and real-world comparisons to refine patient selection are ongoing in the phase 2 PLUME trial.

Pembrolizumab Regimen May Show Synergy in Melanoma Populations

Sabrina Serani
November 9th 2025
Article

Biomarker analyses and real-world comparisons to refine patient selection are ongoing in the phase 2 PLUME trial.

Experts highlight the top 5 presentations from ESMO 2025 that may have long-term clinical implications for genitourinary cancer management.

What Were The Most Impactful GU Oncology Data From ESMO 2025?

Manojkumar Bupathi, MD, MS;Benjamin Garmezy, MD
November 6th 2025
Podcast

Experts highlight the top 5 presentations from ESMO 2025 that may have long-term clinical implications for genitourinary cancer management.

While more work must be done to minimize toxicity, antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated benefits for patients with glioblastoma.

Evaluating the Viability of Antibody Drug Conjugates for Glioblastoma

Tim Cortese
November 7th 2025
Article

While more work must be done to minimize toxicity, antibody-drug conjugates have demonstrated benefits for patients with glioblastoma.

Presenting investigators at ESMO Congress 2025 highlight findings from clinical trials assessing novel therapeutics across different disease types.

What Were the Key Presentations at ESMO 2025? Oncology Experts Discuss

Sara A. Hurvitz, MD;Xiuning Le, MD, PhD;Erica L. Mayer, MD, MPH
October 27th 2025
Podcast

Presenting investigators at ESMO Congress 2025 highlight findings from clinical trials assessing novel therapeutics across different disease types.

The safety profile of palazestrant plus ribociclib in a phase 1b trial was comparable with prior reports of each individual agent.

Palazestrant Combo Shows Preliminary Activity in ER+/HER2– Breast Cancer

Russ Conroy
November 6th 2025
Article

The safety profile of palazestrant plus ribociclib in a phase 1b trial was comparable to prior reports of each individual agent.

The 24-month RFS rates were 95.1%, 81.2%, 69.4%, and 48.4% in patients with stage III melanoma who experienced a pCR, near pCR, pPR, pNR, respectively.

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab/Ipilimumab Shows Superior EFS in Resectable Melanoma

Caroline Seymour
November 5th 2025
Article

The 24-month RFS rates were 95.1%, 81.2%, 69.4%, and 48.4% in patients with stage III melanoma who experienced a pCR, near pCR, pPR, pNR, respectively.