Julie Vose, MD, MBA, Discussed Toxicities Associated With Acalabrutinib or Ibrutinib for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

News
Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Julie Vose, MD, MBA, at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting to talk about a clinical trial comparing acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meeting (ASCO), CancerNetwork® spoke with Julie Vose, MD, MBA, about the phase 3 ELEVATE CLL R/R trial (NCT02477696) concerning acalabrutinib (Calquence) versus ibrutinib (Imbruvica) for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Vose focused on the toxicities associated with the treatments with the second-generation Brurton tyrosine kinase inhibitor potentially showing fewer toxic effects.

The study was a randomized, open-label, multicenter trial with the primary end point of progression-free survival and the secondary end points including the incidence of treatment-emergent infections of grade 3 or greater and overall survival.

Transcript:

One [abstract from ASCO 2021] that was very interesting to me was a trial that was in CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, where patients were randomized to acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib for [the treatment of] CLL. This trial was a noninferiority trial so that the outcomes as far as responses were not that clinically significantly different [between arms]. What was different was the toxicities. We had always felt that possibly the second-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors would be less toxic. This was the first trial that demonstrated that in a randomized trial, where the acalabrutinib, which is a second-generation [agent, caused] less atrial fibrillation and less hypertension. It did have a little bit higher [toxicity] in some categories, such as headach. I think it showed some of the changes that we felt were always there [we have now seen] demonstrated in a prospective randomized trial.

References

Byrd J, Hillmen P, Ghia P, et al. First results of a head-to-head trial of acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib in previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):7500. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.7500

Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
The FDA approval of tarlatamab in SCLC has received much press attention, according to Daniel R. Carrizosa, MD, MS.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
Related Content