Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, Compares Efficacy of Durvalumab/CRT Vs Placebo/CRT in High-Risk Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Video

The 12-month progression-free survival rates among patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer were comparable with durvalumab plus chemoradiotherapy vs placebo plus radiotherapy.

At the 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, a radiation oncologist and professor of radiation medicine and applied sciences at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine, spoke with CancerNetwork® about key findings from the phase 3 CALLA trial (NCT03830866), assessing the addition of durvalumab (Infinzi) to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs placebo/CRT in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer.

The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 76.0% for patients receiving durvalumab with CRT and 73.3% for those in the placebo arm. Additionally, the 24-month PFS rate was 65.9% in the durvalumab arm and 62.1% for those receiving placebo (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08; P = .174). Mayadev also discussed the trial’s international design and her takeaway from the subgroup analysis.

Transcript:

This was a global effort. We had more than 120 sites [in] 15 countries across the globe [and enrolled] patients with high-risk cervical cancer; these were truly high-risk patients. More than two-thirds had node-positive disease, and [had] stage IIIA/IVA disease. We randomized 770 patients in less than 2 years during a pandemic to CRT [and] durvalumab vs. placebo. Our primary objective was progression-free survival [PFS]. At 1 year, the PFS was no different between the durvalumab arm and the placebo arm. In terms of the hazard ratios in more granular detail, the 12-month PFS rate with the durvalumab/chemoradiation [arm] was 76.0% vs 73.3% with a placebo arm. At 24 months, the rate in durvalumab arm was 65.9% vs 62.1% with placebo. The hazard ratio was 0.84 and the P value was 0.174. We’ve presented the maturity at 31% at ASTRO 2022 as a plenary session. The median follow-up time was 18.5 months. In terms of the subgroup analysis, depending on the nodal status or the timeliness of radiation, there were no differences in terms of the durvalumab arm [vs the placebo arm].

Reference

Mayadev JS, Rong, Y, Toita T, et al. Durvalumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC): radiotherapy (RT) delivery and subgroup analyses from CALLA. Presented at 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting; October 23-26, 2022; San Antonio, TX; LBA 03. Accessed October 27, 2022.

Recent Videos
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Related Content