Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, Compares Efficacy of Durvalumab/CRT Vs Placebo/CRT in High-Risk Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer

Video

The 12-month progression-free survival rates among patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer were comparable with durvalumab plus chemoradiotherapy vs placebo plus radiotherapy.

At the 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting, Jyoti S. Mayadev, MD, a radiation oncologist and professor of radiation medicine and applied sciences at the University of California San Diego School of Medicine, spoke with CancerNetwork® about key findings from the phase 3 CALLA trial (NCT03830866), assessing the addition of durvalumab (Infinzi) to chemoradiotherapy (CRT) vs placebo/CRT in patients with high-risk locally advanced cervical cancer.

The 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 76.0% for patients receiving durvalumab with CRT and 73.3% for those in the placebo arm. Additionally, the 24-month PFS rate was 65.9% in the durvalumab arm and 62.1% for those receiving placebo (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08; P = .174). Mayadev also discussed the trial’s international design and her takeaway from the subgroup analysis.

Transcript:

This was a global effort. We had more than 120 sites [in] 15 countries across the globe [and enrolled] patients with high-risk cervical cancer; these were truly high-risk patients. More than two-thirds had node-positive disease, and [had] stage IIIA/IVA disease. We randomized 770 patients in less than 2 years during a pandemic to CRT [and] durvalumab vs. placebo. Our primary objective was progression-free survival [PFS]. At 1 year, the PFS was no different between the durvalumab arm and the placebo arm. In terms of the hazard ratios in more granular detail, the 12-month PFS rate with the durvalumab/chemoradiation [arm] was 76.0% vs 73.3% with a placebo arm. At 24 months, the rate in durvalumab arm was 65.9% vs 62.1% with placebo. The hazard ratio was 0.84 and the P value was 0.174. We’ve presented the maturity at 31% at ASTRO 2022 as a plenary session. The median follow-up time was 18.5 months. In terms of the subgroup analysis, depending on the nodal status or the timeliness of radiation, there were no differences in terms of the durvalumab arm [vs the placebo arm].

Reference

Mayadev JS, Rong, Y, Toita T, et al. Durvalumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC): radiotherapy (RT) delivery and subgroup analyses from CALLA. Presented at 2022 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) Annual Meeting; October 23-26, 2022; San Antonio, TX; LBA 03. Accessed October 27, 2022.

Recent Videos
Treatment with lorlatinib did not increase cardiovascular events among patients with ALK-positive non–small cell lung cancer in the CROWN trial.
Having all the necessary staff together, from medical oncologists to pharmacists, helps deliver the best possible outcomes to patients with cancer.
At 5 years, 60% of patients who received lorlatinib in the phase 3 CROWN study achieved progression-free survival.
Joseph C. Landolfi, DO, CPE, and Michelle Morrison, MPH, BSHA, RN, discuss how they can use their leadership roles to improve cancer care.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Leadership of a new cancer center as part of JFK University Medical Center discuss how they can support frontline clinicians.
CAR T-cell therapy initially developed for mantle cell lymphoma was subsequently assessed in marginal zone lymphoma.
The efficacy of the BOVen regimen in chronic lymphocytic leukemia facilitated its evaluation in patients with mantle cell lymphoma.
Beta emitters like 177Lu-rosopatamab may offer built-in PSMA imaging during the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Related Content