Kidney Cancer Research Program May Play Pivotal Role in Advancing Care

Commentary
Video

An “avalanche of funding” has propelled the kidney cancer field forward, says Jason Muhitch, PhD.

In a collaboration with KidneyCAN, CancerNetwork® spoke with Elizabeth P. Henske, MD, and Jason Muhitch, PhD, about the Kidney Cancer Research Program, and how funding through this initiative has yielded progress in the kidney cancer field.

Henske is the director of the Center for LAM Research and Clinical Care and a physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, as well as a professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and an associate member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. Muhitch is an associate professor of oncology, cochair of the Genitourinary Translational Research Group, deputy director of Graduate Studies, and a member of the Department of Immunology at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center.

Muhitch described the history of the Kidney Cancer Research Program since its inception in 2017, noting how an “avalanche” of dedicated funds from this program has propelled research efforts in the field. Henske highlighted how the program has been “pivotal” in aiding breakthroughs in the care of patients with kidney cancer.

KidneyCAN is a nonprofit organization with a mission to accelerate cures for kidney cancer through education, advocacy, and research funding. Learn more about KidneyCAN’s mission and work here.

Transcript:

Muhitch: It’s been about 5 years since I [first] connected with the Kidney Cancer Research Program. It goes all the way for me. It’s a little personal, too. During the [COVID-19] pandemic, this was my first major peer-reviewed funding award, and I received that in the middle of the pandemic in our basement. I’m also thinking back to some of the stories that I learned about how this all came to be, and it was a little bit earlier than that. My understanding is that there was a small group of advocates, and they partnered with physicians and researchers to have more of these discussion with congressional offices about establishing dedicated funds for kidney cancer research. That began back in 2017. Prior to that, there was funding through these umbrella programs for kidney cancer research. But it really took a huge leap forward at that time.

In 2017, dedicated funding for kidney cancer was [approximately] $10 million. It doubled soon afterwards, and now, I believe the most current Kidney Cancer Research Program [fund] was $50 million. An avalanche of funding has propelled the community forward.

Henske: The Kidney Cancer Research Program is pivotal to the place we are right now in terms of the care of individuals who have kidney cancer and to the future of kidney cancer research and breakthroughs in clinical care. I just can’t overstate how important it is. The Kidney Cancer Research Program has helped us make several critical breakthroughs in the care of individuals who have the most common type of kidney cancer, and we’re now able to start thinking about the other types of kidney cancer, some of which affect children and young adults. We’ve made a lot of progress already thanks to the Kidney Cancer Research Program, and we have so much more that we urgently want and need to do for individuals who have tumors of the kidney.

Reference

Kidney cancer. Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs. Accessed December 6, 2024. https://tinyurl.com/mwpxysx4

KidneyCAN's 2025 Advocacy Days are March 10 to 11, 2025 and September 22 to 23, 2025. If you are interested in getting involved with KidneyCAN's advocacy efforts, please contact Debra Beyhan.

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Related Content