Lacrotrectinib Leads to Prolonged Response in NTKR+ Tumors

Article

Across 3 clinical trials, investigators continued to observe durable responses with larotrectinib, which showed the importance of NTRK gene fusion testing in patients with various cancer types.

Patients with various NTRK gene fusion–positive cancer types who were analyzed across 3 clinical trials (NCT02576431, NCT02122913, and NCT02637687) in an expanded analysis with extended follow-up of larotrectinib (Vitrakvi) use had improved response, survival, and safety benefits with treatment, according to findings were presented in a poster during the 2022 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting.

Alexander E. Drilon, MD, of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, presented the data and said they highlight the importance of NTRK gene fusion testing in patients across various cancer types.

Investigators examined patients with non-primary central nervous system (CNS) TRK fusion cancer to determine the efficacy and safety of larotrectinib, a first-in-class, highly selective, CNS-active TRK inhibitor, in this patient population.

At the time of the data cut-off, 244 patients were treated with larotrectinib across 25 different tumor types who were deemed to be evaluable for efficacy by independent review committee (IRC). The most common tumor type included was soft tissue sarcoma (43%), followed by thyroid (11%), lung (10%), salivary gland (9%), and colorectal (7%).

Those examined in the updated dataset were male and female patients ranging from 0.1-84 years of age. Many had an ECOG or an equivalent Lansky performance status of 0-1 (52% and 36%, respectively), and the median number of prior systemic therapies patients had was 1 (range, 0-10). NTRK1 gene fusions were found in 46% of patients (n = 113), NTRK2 in 3% (n = 7), and NTRK3 in 51% (n=124). Further, 27%, 28%, and 45% of patients had 0, 1, and 2 or more prior lines of systemic therapy, respectively.

The overall response rate (ORR) was 69% (95% CI; 63-75) with 64 patients having a (26%) complete response (CR), including 13 (5%) who had a pathological CR. There were 104 patients (43%) who had partial response, 41 (17%) with stable disease, 20 (8%) with progressive disease, and 15 (6%) who were not determined.

The ORR of the 18 patients who had known baseline CNS metastases evaluable per IRC was 83% (95% CI, 59-96). Including adult patients (n=157), the ORR was 64% (95% CI, 56-72) with a median duration of response (DoR) of 41.7 months (95% CI, 32.5-NE) at a median follow-up of 28.5 months.

In regard to the treatment duration, median time to response was 1.8 months (range, 0.9-16.2) with the duration of treatment ranging from 0.1 to 67.9 months. Median DoR was 32.9 months (95% CI, 27.3-41.7) with a median follow-up of 28.3 months.Additionally, the median PFS was 29.4 months (95% CI 19.3-34.3) and median follow-up was 29.3 months. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached at the time of the median follow-up of 32.2 months. However, the 48-month OS rate was 64% (95% CI 55-73).

In order to exclude the possible confounding effect of ongoing enrollment on median DoR, an exploratory analysis was also conducted in a subset of 164 patients with a median follow-up of 28.1 months. The ORR in this subset of patients was 74% (95% CI 67–81), the median DoR was 34.5 months (95% CI 27.6–43.3), and the median follow-up was 34.1 months.

In regard to safety, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were mainly grade 1 or 2, with no new or unexpected safety signals seen. However, 53 (20%) patients had grade 3 or 4 TRAEs, including an alanine and aspartate aminotransferase increase, a neutrophil count decrease, lymphocyte count decrease, and more.

“Things to watch out for with TRK inhibitors include neurologic side effects such as dizziness, weight gain, and withdrawal pain when these drugs are temporarily or permanently discontinued. But overall, despite the longer follow-up and increase of the total number, there were no new or unexpected safety signals observed with larotrectinib,” stated Drilon during a presentation of his poster.

A total of 5 (2%) patients ended up discontinuing treatment due to TRAEs consisting of emotional poverty, hypoventilation, neutropenia, decrease in neutrophil count, alanine aminotransferase increases, and aspartate aminotransferase increases, all occurring in one patient each.

“Larotrectinib, regardless of tumor type in adult and pediatric and adult cancers with an NTRK fusion, can demonstrate very robust responses and durable responses in patients with TRK fusion cancer,” said Drilon.

Reference

Drilon AE, Hong DS, M Martinus van Tilburg et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of larotrectinib in a pooled analysis of patients with tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) fusion cancer. J Clin Oncol 2022;40 (suppl 16): 3100. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.16_suppl.3100

Recent Videos
According to John Henson, MD, “What we need are better treatments to control the [brain] tumor once it’s detected.”
First-degree relatives of patients who passed away from pancreatic cancer should be genetically tested to identify their risk for the disease.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Sonia Jain, PhD, stated that depatuxizumab mafodotin, ABBV-221, and ABBV-321 were 3 of the most prominent ADCs in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma.
Related Content