Laurence Albigès, MD, PhD, on the Benefit of Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab for Advanced RCC

Video

Laurence Albigès, MD, PhD, speaks to how patients with treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma can benefit from treatment with nivolumab and ipilimumab.

During the 2022 Genitourinary Cancers Symposium, Laurence Albigès, MD, PhD, a medical oncologist and head of the Genitourinary Unit at Gustave Roussy in Villejuif, spoke with CancerNetwork® about the benefit of treatment with nivolumab (Opdivo)/ipilimumab (Yervoy) in patients with treatment-naïve advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma based on findings from the CheckMate 214 study (NCT02231749).

Albigès highlighted the promising and potentially sustained responses that occurred with the combination plus the positive quality of life and safety profile patients experienced following treatment.

Transcript:

The key takeaway beyond the overall survival benefit is about the likelihood of achieving a 10% to 12% complete response [rate] in our patients. It is also about sustained benefit over time, as I mentioned with longer follow up. And we do know that for some of these patients, treatment discontinued [but they] maintained a great response. It’s really the long-term benefit that is a key message. In terms of safety, our colleagues are familiar with the fact that we need to closely monitor patients, especially in the first 6 months when we’re [administering] the doublet part of this regimen—nivolumab plus ipilimumab. This is where immune-related toxicity may occur. Ultimately, I want to comment on the quality of life that has been reported with this regimen. In these patients, despite the risk of immune-mediated toxicity, we did see a great increase in terms of quality of life for our patients.

Reference

Tannir NM, Signoretti S, Choueiri TK, et al. Efficacy and safety of nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N+I) versus sunitinib (S) for first-line treatment of patients with advanced sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma (sRCC) in the phase 3 CheckMate 214 trial with extended 5-year minimum follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 6):352. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.352

Recent Videos
Ongoing studies in kidney cancer aim to explore determinants of immune-related adverse effects and strategies for mitigating them.
Machine learning-based approaches may play a role in further understanding of how somatic alterations influence responses or resistance to therapy.
Data from a first-in-disease trial assessing a personalized cancer vaccine in RCC require validation at a larger level, according to David Braun, MD, PhD.
Blood-based markers of note in kidney cancer prognosis include circulating tumor DNA and proteomic markers, according to Michael B. Atkins, MD.
Clinical trials still have a role in improving outcomes with immunotherapy among those with kidney cancer.
Current research initiatives in the kidney cancer field include exploring anti–PD-1, anti–LAG-3, and anti–CTLA-4 combination regimens.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Related Content