Letrozole Superior to Progestin as Second-Line Postmenopausal Advanced Breast Cancer Therapy

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 6 No 2
Volume 6
Issue 2

VIENNA--The fourth-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole has become the first drug of its class to outperform megestrol acetate as a second-line hormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer who relapsed or progressed during tamoxifen (Nolvadex) therapy.

VIENNA--The fourth-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole has becomethe first drug of its class to outperform megestrol acetate as a second-linehormonal therapy for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancerwho relapsed or progressed during tamoxifen (Nolvadex) therapy.

Speaking at the 21st Congress of the European Society for Medical Oncology(ESMO), Geoffrey Falkson, MD, of the University of Pretoria, reported theresults of a double-blind randomized trial that enrolled 551 patients from10 countries around the world.

Letrozole yielded a higher response rate, more long-lasting responses,and a longer time to treatment failure than the progestin, Dr. Falksonsaid, and was better tolerated, produced fewer side effects, and causedmuch less weight gain.

The objective response rate among women receiving the optimal 2.5 mg/dayletrozole dose was 24%, significantly better than the 16% response rateseen in the progestin group, Dr. Falkson reported.

The median duration of response has not yet been reached in the letrozolegroup but was 18 months with megestrol. Particularly important, he said,is the time to treatment failure: 5.1 months with letrozole vs 3.9 monthswith megestrol.

Median survival duration was 731 days with letrozole and 660 days withmeges-trol, although this difference fell short of reaching statisticalsignificance.

The rate of adverse cardiovascular events, chiefly thromboembolism,was 1.7% among letrozole-treated patients vs 10.1% in the megestrol group.

Among women taking letrozole, 18% gained more than 5% of their bodyweight vs 30% of those on megestrol; 6% on letrozole gained more than 10%of body weight vs 12% on megestrol.

Letrozole was associated with less fatigue and dyspnea, and with lessdeterioration in performance status. The lesser side effect burden of letrozoletranslated into a discontinuation rate of only 3.4% vs 10% for megestrol.

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content