Lisa La on the Design of a Study Evaluating Diabetes in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Video

The director of clinical research in the Center for Cancer Care at White Plains Hospital explained the design of the study which evaluated diabetic versus nondiabetic patients enrolled in the CONNECT Multiple Myeloma Registry.

A descriptive analysis of the CONNECT Multiple Myeloma Registry, presented at the 2020 ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition, aimed to evaluate differences in baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients enrolled in the registry.

In an interview with CancerNetwork®, Lisa La, director of clinical research in the Center for Cancer Care at White Plains Hospital, explained the design of the study.

Transcription:

Sure, so the Celgene, it’s actually a Celgene observational study. It's a large multicenter prospective observational study, primarily enrolling newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients. So, the sample size that they've enrolled from 2009 to 2016, was about 3011 newly diagnosed myeloma patients across 250 sites. Those sites are community, academic, and government sites across the entire US. And it's pretty accurate in terms of not focusing on certain regions of the US, but across all of the entire… so I would say it's pretty representative of the general population. So, patients that were eligible, just as long as you were 18 years and older and had some sort of diagnosis of myeloma, and less than 2 months before you enrolled, so they are they're just being pretty much followed up for treatment and outcomes.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content