Low Cholesterol Linked With Worse RCC Survival

Article

Patients with renal cell carcinoma who had low preoperative levels of serum cholesterol were found to have worse survival, according to the results of a recent study.

RCC patients with low preoperative levels of serum cholesterol were found to have worse survival.

Patients with renal cell carcinoma who had low preoperative levels of serum cholesterol were found to have worse survival, according to the results of a study published today in BJU International.

Because cholesterol is a broadly available marker, researchers led by Tobias Klatte, MD, of the Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Medical University of Vienna, concluded that “its use may provide a meaningful adjunct in clinical practice.”

However, Klatte also added that this study was only hypothesis generating.

“If confirmed, patients with low cholesterol may be considered high-risk and may be treated or followed up more aggressively,” Klatte said in a press release.

The researchers retrospectively studied 867 patients with renal cell carcinoma taken from the prospective kidney cancer database at their institution. Preoperative total cholesterol levels were determined and cancer-specific survival was assessed in an attempt to validate cholesterol as a prognostic biomarker.

Patients in the study had a median serum cholesterol of 195 mg/dL.

The results showed that serum cholesterol decreased with increasing tumor stage (P < .001) and nuclear grade (P = .001). In addition, cholesterol levels were significantly lower in patients with lymph node metastases (P < .001), distant metastases (P < .001), and with histological tumor necrosis (P = .002).

Certain patient characteristics were significantly associated with lower levels of serum cholesterol, including male sex, diabetes, higher performance status, and certain tumor-related symptoms at the time of surgery.

In a univariable analysis, Klatte and colleagues found significant associations between serum cholesterol and cancer-specific survival (HR = 0.87; P < .001). According to the researchers, this indicated “that with each 10 mg/dL increase in cholesterol, the risk of death from renal cell carcinoma decreased by 13%.” Results remained significant upon multivariable analysis (HR = 0.93; P = .001).

Finally, the multivariable model found that patients with high cholesterol levels had a 43% reduced risk for dying from renal cell carcinoma (P = .005).

“We did not find a difference in cholesterol levels between the three major renal cell carcinoma subtypes. Further, cholesterol was similarly prognostic for both clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma,” the researchers wrote. “Data may therefore suggest that the observed effects may in part be patient- and not tumor-related, as the subtypes are commonly associated with stage and grade of disease.”

Recent Videos
A review of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma shows radiological tumor burden as an independent prognostic factor for survival.
A phase 2 trial is assessing ubamatamab in patients with MUC16-expressing SMARCB1-deficient renal medullary carcinoma and epithelioid sarcoma.
Analysis of 2 phase 1 trials compared gut biome diversity between standard of care with or without CBM588 in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Although no responses were observed in 11 patients receiving abemaciclib monotherapy, combination therapies with abemaciclib may offer clinical benefit.
Findings show no difference in overall survival between various treatments for metastatic RCC previously managed with immunotherapy and TKIs.
An epigenomic profiling approach may help pick up the entire tumor burden, thereby assisting with detecting sarcomatoid features in those with RCC.
Ongoing research may clarify the potential benefit of avelumab when administered in combination with other agents in advanced urothelial carcinoma.
Spatial analyses may help determine factors that influence responses to sacituzumab govitecan-containing regimens in urothelial carcinoma.
Attending educational sessions may help with understanding how to manage toxicities associated with enfortumab vedotin in rare genitourinary cancers.
Related Content