Low-Dose Arsenic Leads to APL Remissions

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 7 No 5
Volume 7
Issue 5

NEW ORLEANS--All acute pro-myelocytic leukemia (APL) patients who took part in a pilot clinical trial of arsenic trioxide went into remission, according to a paper presented at the 89th annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

NEW ORLEANS--All acute pro-myelocytic leukemia (APL) patients who took part in a pilot clinical trial of arsenic trioxide went into remission, according to a paper presented at the 89th annual meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR).

"This is not quite as offbeat an alternative as it sounds," Raymond P. Warrell, Jr., MD, professor of medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, said at a press conference. He stressed that he worked with the Food and Drug Administration each step of the way.

In the late 1980s, Chinese researchers reported success in treating APL patients with arsenic. Dr. Warrell and his colleagues began in 1994 to try to replicate this work. He first used melarsoprol (an arsenic compound used to treat sleeping sickness), but found it too toxic. He next tried arsenic trioxide.

Eleven APL patients took part in the study. All had failed extensive prior therapy, including, for some subjects, bone marrow transplantation. Each received a daily infusion of arsenic trioxide until he or she achieved bone marrow remission. The daily doses ranged from 0.07 to 0.20 mg/kg. Four to 6 weeks later, each patient received another 25 days of arsenic trioxide. These 25-day courses of therapy are repeated every 4 to 6 weeks.

Ten patients (eight adults and two children) have been in the study long enough to be evaluated. "To make a long story short, the complete remission rate is 100%," Dr. Warrell said. All signs of APL disappeared. But, he said, "we want to emphasize that this is not a cure." Six patients were tested for molecular evidence of leukemia. Two were still positive, and both later relapsed and died.

Dr. Warrell and his colleagues have watched the patients carefully for toxic effects. He has found the low doses used to be well tolerated. Patients have only mild side effects, but do find the hours-long daily infusions quite tedious. Some have received 3 courses of therapy over 5 months, with no long-term effects seen.

Dr. Warrell said their next steps would be to fine-tune the dosage and try to find a more convenient schedule. He also plans to test arsenic in combination with other anticancer drugs.

Recent Videos
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Destigmatizing cancer care for incarcerated patients may help ensure that they feel supported both in their treatment and their humanity.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
A lower percentage of patients who were released within 1 year of incarceration received guideline-concurrent care vs incarcerated patients.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
A collaboration between the Connecticut Departments of Health and Corrections and the COPPER Center aimed to improve outcomes among incarcerated patients.
Related Content