Lucanix Anti-TGF-β2 Vaccine May Prolong NSCLC Survival

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 15 No 10
Volume 15
Issue 10

A vaccine that blocks production of transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-β2) extended 1-year survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

ATLANTA—A vaccine that blocks production of transforming growth factor-beta 2 (TGF-β2) extended 1-year survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a phase II study and should be moved forward into phase III clinical trials, lead investigator John J. Nemunaitis, MD, reported at the 42nd Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (abstract 7018). Dr. Nemunaitis is executive medical director of the Mary Crowley Medical Research Center, which is located within the Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas, Texas.

An Attractive Target

TGF-β2 is an attractive target for cancer therapy, Dr. Nemunaitis said, because it is produced by cancer cells and inhibits multiple parts of the anti-tumor immune response system, including T and B lymphocytes, activation of antigen-presenting cells, natural killer cell function, and interferon-gamma production by immune effector cells. It also induces FoxP3 expression and stimulates Tregulatory cell generation.

Lucanix is a TGF-β2 antisense gene-modified allogeneic tumor cell vaccine. It enhances tumor antigen recognition by inhibiting TGF-β2. No viral vector is required, and the vaccine is given by monthly injection. The agent is being developed by NovaRx Corporation, San Diego, California.

Dr. Nemunaitis reported the results of a phase II study of Lucanix in 75 NSCLC patients (2 stage IIB, 12 stage IIIA, 14 stage IIIB, 47 stage IV). All of the advanced-stage patients had received extensive prior chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to three dose levels of the vaccine (1.25, 2.5, 5.0 × 10

7

cells/injection) given intradermally, to a maximum of 16 injections, either monthly or every other month. The main toxicity was local (grade 1) erythema. There were no grade 3 or worse adverse events related to the vaccine.

Dose-Reponse Seen

Dr. Nemunaitis reported a 15% response rate to the vaccine (partial response and stable disease), and a dose-response effect. Survival was longer in patients who received more than 2.5 × 107 cells/injection, compared with those who received 2.5 × 107 cells/injection or less (P = .0155).

In the stage IIIB-IV patients, survival at 1 year was 61% in the high-dose group vs 40% in the low-dose group, and at 2 years, 52% and 13%, respectively. By comparison, historical data of studies of stage IIIB-IV NSCLC patients show 1-year survival of 18% to 19% with placebo, 28% with erlotinib (Tarceva), 29% to 30% with docetaxel (Taxotere), and 30% with pemetrexed (Alimta), Dr. Nemunaitis said.

Dr. Nemunaitis also showed that, at week 12, immunologic activity induced by the vaccine was significantly greater in responding patients than in those with progressive disease.

"Lucanix administered at a dose of 2.5 × 107 cells/injection or more is felt to be optimal, based on the high safety profile and suggestion of greater survival duration in comparison to historical standard of care. Phase III investigation is justified, given the high level of safety of this vaccine," Dr. Nemunaitis concluded.

During the discussion period, Dr. Nemunaitis said that a phase III trial was scheduled to begin in November that would compare Lucanix to pemetrexed in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Recent Videos
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
Thinking about how to sequence additional agents following targeted therapy may be a key consideration in the future of lung cancer care.
Endobronchial ultrasound, robotic bronchoscopy, or other expensive procedures may exacerbate financial toxicity for patients seeking lung cancer care.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Advancements in antibody drug conjugates, bispecific therapies, and other targeted agents may hold promise in lung cancer management.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Decreasing the low-dose bath of proton therapy to the body may limit the impact of radiation on lymphocytes and affect tumor response.
According to Eyub Akdemir, MD, reducing EDIC may be feasible without compromising target coverage to reduce anticipated lymphopenia rates.
Related Content