Maintenance Therapy for Transplant-Ineligible MM

Video

Take-home points from the MAIA trial of daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone as therapy for patients with newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible multiple myeloma, and recommendations regarding maintenance therapy following the use of a triplet regimen.

Robert Orlowski, MD, PhD: Let’s move to the next polling question. When you initiate a triplet therapy, how often do you continue that into the maintenance setting? Your options are No. 1, always; No. 2, most of the time; No. 3, some of the time; No. 4, rarely; and No. 5, never. Caitlin let’s say you do VRd [bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone] lite or daratumumab-Rd [lenalidomide, dexamethasone] on this transplant-ineligible patient. What would you do for maintenance afterward?

Caitlin Costello, MD: I’m going to be a stickler here because for semantic purposes, we’re talking about continuous therapy vs post-transplant maintenance per se. We’re talking about a patient who doesn’t go to transplant and is going to stay on continuous therapy for as long as they can tolerate if it’s working. I saw a comment from the audience saying that patients would go on a doublet if they could drop the dexamethasone. Many of us who are referring to doublets are talking about dexamethasone plus something else as opposed to 2 active drugs plus or minus dexamethasone. I’m comfortable with patients who are on long-term continuous therapy dropping the dexamethasone. That’s the least active of the triplets that we do and the most active in terms of toxicity. If I can keep people on a monoclonal antibody plus or minus lenalidomide or a monoclonal antibody plus or minus a proteasome inhibitor, I’m going to try and keep the doublet of the 2 most active drugs. We’ve seen from the MAIA data that that’s practical. We’ve seen that we can keep patients on therapy for a very long time. There are maintenance data post-transplant saying we can get people off the dexamethasone. The SWOG-S0777 study also looked at trying and get people off dexamethasone. We should be trying to get people off dexamethasone because that’s often the biggest thing that affects quality of life.

Robert Orlowski, MD, PhD: We do have some differences of opinion on the polling questions because it seems as though there’s an even split between keeping people on triplet maintenance most of the time, some of the time, and rarely. Jeff, where do you fall on the spectrum? Are you always at the top or never at the bottom if you want to be controversial?

Jeff Matous, MD: When I start out, of course, in my head it’s always. But then you treat patients, and after giving several cycles to patients say there’s treatment fatigue. The more important goal is to keep people on therapy longer and not have them abort therapy soon because of toxicity or adverse effects. I’m right in line with Caitlin: the dexamethasone is the first thing to go. That shortens your clinic appointments by 10 minutes each time you see the patient. I try to keep both drugs going in a certain setting, like DRd [daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone]. The more challenging question is what do you do with an RVd [lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone] or RVd [lenalidomide, bortezomib, dexamethasone] light patient? I think 8 cycles is what they gave in SWOG-0777. If you got 8 cycles in those patients, what do you do with those patients after that?

Robert Orlowski, MD, PhD: Hopefully in the future, what we’re trying to do through SWOG is set up a study for frail patients, so there would be a 3-arm trial. One arm would get VRd [bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone] light followed by R [lenalidomide] maintenance. A second arm would get DRd [daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone] followed by R [lenalidomide] maintenance. The third arm would be DRd [daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone] followed by DR [daratumumab, lenalidomide] maintenance. If we can get the results from that study a few years down the road, then they would help to answer a lot of these questions that we’ve been struggling with.

Transcript edited for clarity.

Recent Videos
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Current FDA expectations may allow patients to return to their community physicians at 2 weeks after administration of anitocabtagene autoleucel.
Based on its mechanism of action, anito-cel may cause fewer instances of cytokine release syndrome and delayed toxicities vs other therapies.
Combining daratumumab with other agents is one strategy that investigators are exploring in the smoldering multiple myeloma field.
A substantial portion of patients who received daratumumab in the AQUILA study were able to delay disease progression to active multiple myeloma.
The approval of daratumumab validates the notion of using limited therapy to help delay progression from smoldering disease to multiple myeloma.
Related Content