Many States Ignore Prevention in Plans to Spend Tobacco Funds

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 8 No 6
Volume 8
Issue 6

WASHINGTON-In at least one-third of the states, legislators have proposed spending less than 2% of the funds the state will receive from last year’s tobacco settlement on antitobacco prevention programs, according to a new report by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and the American Heart Association (AHA). The AHA says many state legislators are ignoring evidence that tobacco prevention programs work, especially those aimed at young people.

WASHINGTON—In at least one-third of the states, legislators have proposed spending less than 2% of the funds the state will receive from last year’s tobacco settlement on antitobacco prevention programs, according to a new report by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids and the American Heart Association (AHA). The AHA says many state legislators are ignoring evidence that tobacco prevention programs work, especially those aimed at young people.

Four states have made a commitment to fund tobacco prevention programs beyond a minimal level, and eight others are considering such proposals. But in one-third of the states and the District of Columbia, allocating of funds was dominated by proposals for things totally unrelated to the purposes for which the states brought their lawsuits, such as reducing the car tax in Rhode Island and funding college scholarships in Michigan.

Recent Videos
“It’s a drug that I’m very comfortable with, and it is a drug I’ll likely use primarily in the first-line setting,” stated Jorge Nieva, MD, on taletrectinib in non–small cell lung cancer.
4 experts in this video
4 experts in this video
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.