Medicare Makes Some Changes in Outpatient Cancer Clinic Rates

Publication
Article
OncologyONCOLOGY Vol 14 No 6
Volume 14
Issue 6

Medicare has made some changes in how it will calculate payments to outpatient cancer clinics when the new

Medicare has made some changes in how it will calculate payments to outpatient cancer clinics when the new ambulatory payment classification (APC) system goes into effect on July 1, 2000. The Association of Community Cancer Centers (ACCC) and the American Society of Clinical Oncology warned of the dire effects that would be caused by the version of the APC Medicare published in September 1998. They argued that the proposed reimbursement rates would preclude clinics from treating patients with expensive drugs such as paclitaxel (Taxol) and topotecan (Hycamtin). In the final rule, Medicare sanded down some of the objectionable edges in the 1998 proposal because Congress, which had also heard the outcries of the cancer community, forced the agency’s hand.

The APC system reimburses a clinic for all services in one payment, except the physician’s time, which he or she bills directly to Medicare. The problem is that Medicare calculated APCs for such things as chemotherapy administration based on 1996 costs, not taking into account the more expensive drugs introduced since then. With that in mind, Congress included an amendment in the Balanced Budget Refinement Act passed last fall. That amendment said that Medicare must develop additional “transitional, pass-through” payments for drugs in certain categories—one of which is cancer drugs—if they meet certain high-cost standards. These pass-through payments can only be made for 2 to 3 years; total pass-through payments to any clinic are limited by a formula. The ACCC believes that, when all is said and done, reimbursement for cancer drugs should amount to about 95% of average wholesale prices.

Recent Videos
2 experts are featured in this series.
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Related Content