An overview of predictive and prognostic biomarkers used by breast oncologists to aid in adjuvant treatment decisions for HR-positive disease, as outlined by the NCCN guidelines.
Kristie Kahl: Absolutely. What are the predictive and prognostic factors that you use to guide treatment selection as an outline in the NCCN [National Comprehensive Cancer Network] guidelines?
Lee Schwartzberg, MD, FACP: The factors we use to determine what kind of adjuvant therapy patients should receive are based on combination of clinical factors or so-called anatomical factors, patient-related factors, and tumor-related factors. That is the biology of the tumor. In terms of the clinical factors and the anatomical factors, that relates to the size of the tumor whether it’s very small, or T1 lesion, or T1a and T1b lesion, which we consider very small. Less than 1 centimeter [cm]. T1c, 1 cm to 2 cm. T2, 2 cm to 5 cm. T3. And as the size of the tumor goes up, the risk goes up. Very importantly, the nodal status is an indicator or prognosis. With no nodes being better than any nodes positive. And essentially, an incremental risk that goes up with the number of nodes that are positive. We also look at the grade of the tumor. That’s a very important aspect of prognosis that sometimes is forgotten. There is some variation among pathologists about grade which is why it’s a bit difficult to standardize. But clearly, patients who have grade 3 tumors, which is the highest grade, or undifferentiated cancers have a much higher risk than those that have low-grade tumors. The grading is 1, 2, or 3. Low-intermediate and high risk. The biologic factors that we look at include the biomarkers that are essential for every breast cancer to have recorded. That includes estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2. Estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity make the cancer hormone receptor-positive, and therefore potentially hormone sensitive. By blocking estrogen either by blocking it competitively with a drug like Tamoxifen or in women whose ovaries are no longer functioning, by blocking the production of the small amount of estrogen that is made in other tissues through conversion of other factors. Through aromatase. We can use an aromatase inhibitor to block essentially almost all estrogen from being made. That basically is a growth signal and a signal to keep cancer cells alive. That little bit of estrogen can do that. An aromatase inhibitor can work very well in patients who are postmenopausal. In fact, in the early trials when compared with Tamoxifen, they were better than Tamoxifen. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors are the standard of care for adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Transcript edited for clarity.
NCCN Guideline Updates in HR+ Breast Cancer: Focus on Extended Adjuvant Therapy
August 17th 2021This article reviews NCCN Guideline updates regarding the use of genomic assays in predicting the benefit of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy in patients with HR+ breast cancer and includes insights from Lee S. Schwartzberg, MD, of West Cancer Center at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center in Memphis, TN.
Individualizing Extended Adjuvant Therapy in HR+ Breast Cancer
June 15th 2021This article reviews individualizing extended adjuvant therapy for patients with HR+ breast cancer and includes insights from Vijayakrishna (V. K.) Gadi, MD, PhD, of the University of Illinois in Chicago, and Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, of the University of Miami Health System in Deerfield Beach, FL.
Advances in Later-Line Management of Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma
May 27th 2021This article reviews advances in later-line management of relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. This article also features insights from oncology expert Sameh Gaballa, MD, of Moffitt Cancer Center in Tampa, Florida.