Mounzer E. Agha, MD, Discussed the Value of ASCO Annual Meeting for Multiple Myeloma

Video

Agha emphasized that the annual conference allows investigators to set the foundation for what’s to come in the treatment of multiple myeloma and other hematologic malignancies.

Mounzer Agha, MD, of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Hillman Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® at the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting about the value of the conference, specifically the ability of investigators to come together and discuss the future of treatment across tumor types.

Transcription:

ASCO, along with [the American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting] and the European Hematology Association [Congress], is a representative benchmark where we really set the foundation for what’s to come in the next year and the years to come. What we hope to accomplish at this ASCO is to set the foundation for treatments that were [once] viewed as applicable only for last-line therapy [and apply them to] earlier treatment settings safely. In the field of multiple myeloma, we are still discussing the role of high-dose melphalan in autologous stem cell transplant. This role has gone unchallenged now for a couple of decades and if you really think about it, it is not a curative treatment. It does lead to an improvement in survival and disease control, but it does not represent a long-term solution for patients with multiple myeloma. CAR T[-cell therapy] offers the hope of long-term disease control and perhaps cure in a subset of patients [with multiple myeloma]. What we demonstrate this time is that you can offer this treatment effectively and safely. This represents a paradigm shift and ASCO is the venue that we would like to disseminate this to the public and to other physicians.

Reference

Agha ME, Cohen AD, Madduri D, et al. CARTITUDE-2: Efficacy and safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy, in patients with progressive multiple myeloma (MM) after one to three prior lines of therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):8013. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.8013

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content