Multidisciplinary Team Is ‘Critical’ in Providing CAR T Therapy for Blood Cancers

Commentary
Video

Treatment with CAR T cells may allow patients with hematologic malignancies to recover more quickly compared with a transplant, says Andre Goy, MD.

During the 2023 American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, CancerNetwork® spoke with Andre Goy, MD, about how a multidisciplinary care team is imperative to administering CAR T-cell therapy to patients with hematologic malignancies quickly, and managing any toxicities.

Goy, the physician in chief of Hackensack Meridian Health Oncology Care Transformation Service and the chief physician officer of John Theurer Cancer Center at Hackensack University Medical Center, emphasized that use of CAR T therapy for hematologic malignancies is a collaborative effort that taps into the expertise of pathologists, immunologists, specialized oncologists, and others at his practice. Additionally, he noted that treatment with CAR T cells appears to be a “durable” option capable of yielding cure in a notable portion of patients.

Transcript:

It’s very important to have a platform that uses cell therapy. [Using] cell therapy and CAR T everywhere is probably not a good thing to do. Although we have learned how to live with CAR T; we don’t see as much toxicity, we’re preemptive about it, and we manage patients much better, but it still needs to be [given] in [the right] context. I used to do bone marrow transplant, particularly allogeneic transplant, and the complication can be spectacular in some ways, but they’re easily manageable if you do this early on.

Having people on board from the ID platform, pathology, and imaging; the immunologist; the sub-specialized oncologist; and the ICU team are very critical because this is really something that we [need to] work together on. But the advantage is that, even from the perspective of the community, if a patient ever has relapsed lymphoma, you want longer mileage for your patient. If they come to [receive CAR T-cell therapy], it’s a one-and-done treatment. They go back to the community and actually recover faster than from a transplant. They can be monitored later on in a committee.

Cytopenias are easily manageable because they are immune cytopenias. Supportive care is usually not an issue if their relapse is different; it can be managed by the committee with a one-and-done therapy, and that’s the beauty of T-cell engaging therapy. If it works, T cell-engaging therapy works, from melanoma to other tumors, CAR T is actually quite durable, and I do believe that a significant proportion of these patients are cured.

Recent Videos
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Epistemic closure, broad-scale distribution, and insurance companies are the 3 largest obstacles to implementing new peritoneal surface malignancy care guidelines into practice.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
“This is something where this is written by the trainees, for the trainees, and, of course, for all the other clinicians who take care of patients,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH.
“Everyone—patients, doctors—we all want the same thing. We want [patients] to live longer,” said Kiran Turaga, MD, MPH, on patients with peritoneal surface malignancies.
Data from the phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial at ASCO 2025 revealed a survival advantage with tarlatamab vs chemotherapy in second-line ES-SCLC.
Related Content