NCI, EPA Attempt to Resolve Differences Over Childhood Cancer

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 7 No 3
Volume 7
Issue 3

BETHESDA, Md--Officials of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are attempting to resolve their conflicting interpretations of data regarding cancer in children. The NCI has forcefully challenged the EPA’s contention that the United States is in the midst of an epidemic of childhood malignancies.

BETHESDA, Md--Officials of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are attempting to resolve their conflicting interpretations of data regarding cancer in children. The NCI has forcefully challenged the EPA’s contention that the United States is in the midst of an epidemic of childhood malignancies.

An EPA conference last September declared that cancer in US children has increased steadily over the last quarter century and that the situation demands a focused program to determine the cause of the increase and find means of prevention. This led to a reassessment by NCI epidemiologists of data from the Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.

Martha Linet, MD, who led the NCI review, said that her group found "no evidence of a consistent increase in the incidence during 1973 to 1994 for specific types of childhood cancer."

In late January, senior EPA and NCI officials met for more than 2 hours to discuss the childhood cancer data, Hugh W. McKinnon, MD, of EPA’s National Risk Management Research Laboratory in Cincinnati, reported at the NCAB February meeting. They agreed that staff scientists from the two agencies would hold further meetings to try to resolve the conflicting interpretation of the childhood cancer statistics.

"Honest scientists will have honest disagreements over data, and we are trying to understand that data," Dr. McKinnon told Oncology News International.

Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Patients with lung cancer who achieve a complete response with neoadjuvant therapy may not experience additional benefit with adjuvant immunotherapy.
Numerous trials have displayed the evolution of EGFR inhibition alone or with chemotherapy/radiation in the EGFR-mutated lung cancer space.
2 experts are featured in this series.
Although high grade adverse effects are infrequent among patients undergoing treatment for SCLC, CRS and ICANS may occur in higher frequencies.
Two experts are featured in this series.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Based on a patient’s SCLC subtype, and Schlafen 11 status, patients will be randomly assigned to receive durvalumab alone or with a targeted therapy in the S2409 PRISM trial.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Related Content