New Study Findings Will Generate Better Contralateral Breast Cancer Treatment Discussions Between Providers and Patients, Says Expert

Video

Recent study findings related to risk factors for developing contralateral breast cancer may better influence treatment decisions between patients and physicians, according to a Mayo Clinic expert.

During the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), CancerNetwork® spoke with Siddhartha Yadav, MD, MBBS, a medical oncologist and assistant professor of Medicine and Oncology at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, about the possible practice-changing implications of findings from the population-based prospective CARRIERS study.

According to Yadav, identifying germline mutations such as ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2 as risk factors for contralateral breast cancer will help generate discussions between physicians and their patients on appropriate treatment options. A contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, for instance, may be more or less suitable for patients depending on factors such as the presence of germline mutations or menopausal status.

“We have provided more evidence and numbers to actually guide those decision-making processes [between patients and physicians],” Yadav said.

Transcript:

Today, at least, we did not know how to best manage contralateral breast cancer risk in germline mutation carriers in moderate risk [factors] such as ATM, CHEK2, or PALB2. Now, we have provided this data that says that this is the risk of developing contralateral breast cancer in some of these mutation carriers. What this will eventually lead to is a discussion between patients and their physicians to say, "well, based on your risk, these are the things that we should be thinking about." Right now, if the risk is quite high, for instance, for a BRCA1 mutation carrier who is premenopausal, we see that the risks are quite significantly elevated.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy could be considered, whereas for some women over the age of 65, even if they are BRCA1 mutation carriers, we can now provide the risk estimates and say, "do you really need a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy?" A lot of these are still in discussion between patients and the physicians. But now, we have provided more evidence and numbers to actually guide those decision-making processes.

Reference

Yadav S, Boddicker NJ, Na J, et al. Population-based estimates of contralateral breast cancer risk among carriers of germline pathogenic variants in ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, CHEK2, and PALB2. Presented at the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 6-10, 2022; San Antonio, TX. Abstract GS4-04.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ASCO Annual Meeting, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Prior studies, like the phase 3 VISION trial, may support the notion of combining radiopharmaceuticals with best supportive care.
Related Content