No Significant PFS Benefit With Axitinib in First-Line Metastatic RCC

Article

The second generation VEGFR inhibitor axitinib did not significantly improve progression-free survival in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with patients treated with sorafenib.

The second generation VEGFR inhibitor axitinib did not significantly improve progression-free survival in first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with patients treated with sorafenib.

These results come from a randomized, open-label phase III trial presented earlier this year at the Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. Final results of the study were published online by Thomas E. Hutson, DO, of US Oncology Research, and colleagues in the Lancet Oncology.

The trial included 288 patients with treatment-naive metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were randomly assigned 2:1 to treatment with axitinib (n = 192) or sorafenib (n = 96). At the July 2012 cutoff date, 59% of patients had died or progressed.

No significant difference in median progression-free survival was found between those patients assigned axitinib compared with those assigned sorafenib (10.1 months vs 6.5 months; HR = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.56-1.05).

The researchers did find that median progression-free survival was longer with axitinib in patients with ECOG performance status of 0, but not in patients with performance status of 1. In addition, objective response was more frequent in patients assigned axitinib than with sorafenib.

Serious adverse events occurred in 34% of patients assigned axitinib compared with 25% of patients assigned sorafenib.

In an editorial accompanying the results, Nadia Yousaf, MD, and James Larkin, MD, of Royal Marsden Hospital, London suggested that no efficacy was seen in this patient population because the study was underpowered.

“As the authors acknowledge, the choice of sorafenib as the control can also be criticized as a so-called low bar by comparison with pazopanib or sunitinib, because sorafenib is not generally accepted as first-line standard of care,” they wrote. “Furthermore, in calculation of sample size requirements, the benefit of sorafenib might have been underestimated because earlier studies reported a median progression-free survival of roughly 5 months.”

They went on to point out that although a study with a larger sample size might show a significant benefit for axitinib that with multiple other drugs currently being used for renal cell carcinoma, there are more pressing research issues such as “the optimum scheduling strategies of drugs already approved and expediting of the investigation of truly novel drugs such as those targeting the PD1 receptor, a molecule involved in immune checkpoint signaling.”

Axitinib is currently approved for use in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Recent Videos
Blood-based markers of note in kidney cancer prognosis include circulating tumor DNA and proteomic markers, according to Michael B. Atkins, MD.
Clinical trials still have a role in improving outcomes with immunotherapy among those with kidney cancer.
Current research initiatives in the kidney cancer field include exploring anti–PD-1, anti–LAG-3, and anti–CTLA-4 combination regimens.
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Related Content