(P017) Prolonged Progression-Free Survival for Surgically Managed P16-Negative Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Oropharynx

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

It is well known that survival of patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis with standard chemoradiation. Studies have not compared the addition of surgery to chemoradiation as a method to improve survival. This study was designed to assess the benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) based on p16 status when surgery is included as part of the treatment paradigm for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Eva M. Suarez, MD, Anand Sharma, MD, Kent Armeson, MS, Terry Day, MD; Medical University of South Carolina

Purpose: It is well known that survival of patients with p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma has a poor prognosis with standard chemoradiation. Studies have not compared the addition of surgery to chemoradiation as a method to improve survival. This study was designed to assess the benefit in progression-free survival (PFS) based on p16 status when surgery is included as part of the treatment paradigm for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx.

Methods: A single-institution retrospective analysis identified 120 patients who were treated for stage III or IV oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma that was tested for p16 overexpression. Patients either received surgery followed by postoperative radiation or chemoradiation, as indicated by final pathology (S + RT/CRT), or definitive chemoradiation (CRT). PFS, defined as the time from the completion from treatment until the first evidence of local or distant recurrence, was summarized and plotted using Kaplan-Meier methods. The log-rank test was used to compare survival distributions across treatment groups, with P < .05 indicating statistical significance.

Results: The median follow-up was 19 months. A total of 32 patients tested negative and 88 tested positive for p16 overexpression. In the p16-negative group, 10 were treated with S + RT/CRT and 22 had definitive CRT. In the p16-positive group, 37 patients were treated with S + RT/CRT and 51 had definitive CRT. In the p16-negative group, 62.5% of patients had recurrence of disease (3 in S + RT/CRT arm and 17 in CRT arm) compared with 15.9% in the p16-positive group (5 in S + RT/CRT arm and 9 in CRT arm). PFS for the p16-negative patients was statistically better for the S + RT/CRT group (mean PFS, 24.7 mo) versus CRT (mean PFS, 21.1 mo) (P = .031). Two-year PFS for the S + RT/CRT arm and CRT arm was 68.6% and 22%, respectively. This difference was not seen in the p16-positive population (mean PFS 46.8 mo for S + RT/CRT vs 36.0 mo for CRT; P = .440). Two-year PFS for the S + RT/CRT arm and CRT arm was 94.6% and 79.7%, respectively. There was no statistical difference in overall survival (OS) among the S + RT/CRT arm and CRT arm within the p16-negative group or the p16-positive group.

Conclusion: Surgery followed by RT or CRT improved PFS for patients with p16-negative oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma compared with those who received definitive chemoradiation. A prospective clinical trial is warranted and is in development to further assess treatment options in this group of patients.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content