(P080) After the Thaw: Prostate IGRT Effectively Treats Cryotherapy Failures

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in the management of prostate cancer (PCA) recurrence after primary cryotherapy.

Glen Gejerman, MD, Gene Rosenberg, MD, Vincent Lanteri, MD, Sergey Rome, MD, Kevin Basralian, MD, Daniel Lowe, MD, Mutahar Ahmed, MD, Alberto Zacchino, CMD, Nadia Whittington, MS, Eduard Mullokandov, PhD, Eduard Kagan, MD; Hackensack University Medical Center; New Jersey Urology

Purpose: To retrospectively analyze the efficacy and toxicity of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) in the management of prostate cancer (PCA) recurrence after primary cryotherapy.

Methods: Patients with organ-confined PCA who developed biochemical failure after cryotherapy were treated with definitive IGRT. Acute and late genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects were scored every 4 months using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Effects (CTCAE). PSA was measured at 4- to 6-month intervals after IGRT.

Results: From 2011 through 2013, 16 patients (9 low-risk, 5 intermediate-risk, and 2 high-risk) who failed to respond to primary cryotherapy were treated with 7,920 cGy IGRT. Thirty-one percent received a short course of concurrent androgen suppression. The median age was 72 years (range: 47–80 yr); The median precryotherapy PSA was 4 ng/mL (range: 1.6–17 ng/mL); the median interval from cryotherapy to IGRT was 48 months (range: 12–84 mo); and the median pre-IGRT PSA was 3.4 ng/mL (range: 1.2–27 ng/mL). At a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 9–34 mo), biochemical control was achieved in all patients. Fifty-six percent of patients developed grade 2 GU toxicity requiring the use of an alpha-blocker or cholinergic receptor antagonist, and 12% developed grade 2 GI toxicity requiring the use of corticosteroid suppositories. These side effects resolved within 12 months. No grade 3 toxicity was encountered.

Conclusion: Prostate IGRT after cryotherapy failure is well tolerated, and early results show excellent PSA response.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content