(P094) Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer (LAUPC) Treated With Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy Combined With Radiation Therapy: The Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (IUSCC) Experience

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

A retrospective study was performed to investigate potential prognostic indicators and evaluate treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC), treated with chemotherapy alone (C), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT), induction C followed by concurrent chemoradiation (C-CRT), CRT followed by chemotherapy (CRT-C), or C-CRT followed by C (C-CRT-C).

Table P094

Geoffrey L. Ray, MD, Edward Mannina, MD, MPH, MS, Sandra Althouse, MS, Higinia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine

Purpose: A retrospective study was performed to investigate potential prognostic indicators and evaluate treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC), treated with chemotherapy alone (C), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT), induction C followed by concurrent chemoradiation (C-CRT), CRT followed by chemotherapy (CRT-C), or C-CRT followed by C (C-CRT-C).

Patients and Methods: Medical records from 82 patients (38 women and 44 men) with a mean age of 61.8 years (range: 38–81 yr) diagnosed with LAUPC between January 19, 2000 and May 11, 2012 were reviewed and analyzed. All patients were initially evaluated by a pancreatic surgeon to determine resectability. Tumor locations include the head (71%), body (18%), and other (11%) sites of the pancreas. The majority of the patients (n = 78) received gemcitabine C, and for patients receiving radiation therapy (RT), the median radiation dose was 5,000 cGy. All but one patient had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) above 70. Primary endpoints were median survival time (MST), time to local progression (TTLP), time to local regional progression (TTLRP), and time to distant progression (TTDP), calculated from the time of diagnosis. Baseline patient characteristics regarding age, race, gender, performance status, smoking history, and initial CA 19-9 and tumor characteristics were also included in the analysis.

Results: Median follow-up for all patients was 12 months (range: 9–15 mo). No significant findings were noted regarding patient baseline characteristics with respect to MST, but African Americans had lower TTDP compared with whites: 4 (range: 1–9) vs 9 (range: 7–11) months (P = .02). The following table demonstrates the outcomes with respect to primary endpoints (in months) for each treatment group. All CRT arms had improved outcomes over C alone.

Conclusions: In this single-institution experience, chemoradiation therapy plus pre-CRT and/or post-CRT chemotherapy significantly improved MST, TTLP, and TTLRP compared with chemotherapy alone. However, given the limited number of patients, the various chemotherapy agents used, and the limitations of a retrospective review, further investigation is needed in determining the most appropriate treatment regimen in patients diagnosed with LAUPC.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight the many advantages to attending the 42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, with some additional tidbits to round out the main event.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.
Thomas Powles, MBBS, MRCP, MD, highlighted fatigue, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy as toxicities observed with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
Updated findings from the phase 3 EV-302 trial show enduring responses and survival improvements with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content