(P094) Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Locally Advanced Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer (LAUPC) Treated With Chemotherapy Alone or Chemotherapy Combined With Radiation Therapy: The Indiana University Simon Cancer Center (IUSCC) Experience

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 28 No 1S
Volume 28
Issue 1S

A retrospective study was performed to investigate potential prognostic indicators and evaluate treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC), treated with chemotherapy alone (C), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT), induction C followed by concurrent chemoradiation (C-CRT), CRT followed by chemotherapy (CRT-C), or C-CRT followed by C (C-CRT-C).

Table P094

Geoffrey L. Ray, MD, Edward Mannina, MD, MPH, MS, Sandra Althouse, MS, Higinia R. Cardenes, MD, PhD; Indiana University Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine

Purpose: A retrospective study was performed to investigate potential prognostic indicators and evaluate treatment outcomes in patients diagnosed with locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAUPC), treated with chemotherapy alone (C), concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT), induction C followed by concurrent chemoradiation (C-CRT), CRT followed by chemotherapy (CRT-C), or C-CRT followed by C (C-CRT-C).

Patients and Methods: Medical records from 82 patients (38 women and 44 men) with a mean age of 61.8 years (range: 38–81 yr) diagnosed with LAUPC between January 19, 2000 and May 11, 2012 were reviewed and analyzed. All patients were initially evaluated by a pancreatic surgeon to determine resectability. Tumor locations include the head (71%), body (18%), and other (11%) sites of the pancreas. The majority of the patients (n = 78) received gemcitabine C, and for patients receiving radiation therapy (RT), the median radiation dose was 5,000 cGy. All but one patient had a Karnofsky performance score (KPS) above 70. Primary endpoints were median survival time (MST), time to local progression (TTLP), time to local regional progression (TTLRP), and time to distant progression (TTDP), calculated from the time of diagnosis. Baseline patient characteristics regarding age, race, gender, performance status, smoking history, and initial CA 19-9 and tumor characteristics were also included in the analysis.

Results: Median follow-up for all patients was 12 months (range: 9–15 mo). No significant findings were noted regarding patient baseline characteristics with respect to MST, but African Americans had lower TTDP compared with whites: 4 (range: 1–9) vs 9 (range: 7–11) months (P = .02). The following table demonstrates the outcomes with respect to primary endpoints (in months) for each treatment group. All CRT arms had improved outcomes over C alone.

Conclusions: In this single-institution experience, chemoradiation therapy plus pre-CRT and/or post-CRT chemotherapy significantly improved MST, TTLP, and TTLRP compared with chemotherapy alone. However, given the limited number of patients, the various chemotherapy agents used, and the limitations of a retrospective review, further investigation is needed in determining the most appropriate treatment regimen in patients diagnosed with LAUPC.

Articles in this issue

(P113) Age and Marital Status Are Associated With Choice of Mastectomy in Patients Eligible for Breast Conservation Therapy
(P112) Single-Institution Experience With Intrabeam IORT for Treatment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
(P110) Breast Cancer Before Age 40: Current Patterns in Clinical Presentation and Local Management
(P111) Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Multicatheter High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy: Feasibility and Results in a Private Practice Cohort
(P115) Breast Cancer Laterality Does Not Influence Overall Survival in a Large Modern Cohort: Implications for Radiation-Related Cardiac Mortality
(P117) Anatomical Variations and Radiation Technique for Breast Cancer
(P116) Bilateral Immediate DIEP Reconstruction and Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: Experience at a Tertiary Care Institution
(P118) Metadherin Overexpression Is Associated With Improved Locoregional Control After Mastectomy
(P119) Effect of Economic Environment on Use of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer
(P120) Immediate Versus Delayed Reconstruction After Mastectomy in the United States Medicare Breast Cancer Patient
(P121) Trend in Age and Racial Disparities in the Receipt of Postlumpectomy Radiation Therapy for Stage I Breast Cancer: 2004–2009
(P122) Streamlining Referring Physicians Orders With ‘Reflex Testing’ Significantly Decreases Time to Resolution for Abnormal Screening Mammograms
(P123) National Trends in the Local Management of Early-Stage Paget Disease of the Breast
(P124) Effect of Inhomogeneity on Cardiac and Lung Dose in Partial-Breast Irradiation Using HDR Brachytherapy
(P125) Breast Cancer Outcomes With Anthracycline-Based Chemotherapy for Residual Disease Burden After Full-Dose Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Surgery Followed by Radiation Treatment
Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content