(P117) Outcomes, Patterns of Failures, and Toxicity for Patients Diagnosed With Pulmonary Metastases Treated With Stereotactic Body Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 29 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 29
Issue 4_Suppl_1

SABR is an effective treatment modality for patients with pulmonary metastases, with excellent local control. Further studies are warranted to elucidate which patients with pulmonary metastases would benefit from the local control with SABR and determine when to treat with systemic therapy due to quick progression of distant metastases.

Quynh-Nhu Nguyen, MD, William C. Chance, MD, Peter Balter, PhD, Jim Welsh, MD, Daniel Gomez, MD, Ritsuko Komaki, MD, Zhongxing Liao, MD, Joe Chang, MD, PhD, Reza J. Mehran, MD; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

PURPOSE: To report patterns of failure, outcomes, and toxicity for patients with pulmonary metastases treated with stereotactic body ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, a total of 49 patients with 61 pulmonary metastases were irradiated with SABR doses. Primary histology included: lung (n = 14), gastrointestinal (GI) (n = 15), sarcoma (n = 5), head/neck (n = 6), genitourinary (GU) (n = 3), melanoma (n = 3), endometrial (n = 2), and adrenal (n = 1). SABR doses were prescribed by tumor location and proximity to critical structures (central vs peripheral). The majority of metastases received 50 Gy in four fractions (n = 48), 70 Gy in 10 fractions (n = 3), 40 Gy in four fractions (n = 4), 50 Gy in five fractions (n = 1), or 45 Gy–60 Gy in 10 fractions (n = 5). Local failures were defined as recurrence within the high-dose region; locoregional failures included recurrences outside of the high-dose region, within the same lobe, or lymph nodes; and distant failures occurred in a separate lobe or outside of the thorax.

RESULTS: The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 88% and 66%, respectively, with a median OS time of 29.1 months. The 1-year and 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 64% and 45%, respectively, with a median PFS time of 19.9 months. The 1-year and 2-year freedom from local failure rates were 94% and 84%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year freedom from locoregional failure rates were 80% and 63%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year distant metastases–free survival rates were 72% and 51%, respectively, with a median time to new distant metastases of 26.9 months. The toxicities included brachial plexopathy (grade 2, n = 2), radiation pneumonitis (grade 3, n = 1), and chest wall toxicity (grade 2, n = 7).

CONCLUSION: SABR is an effective treatment modality for patients with pulmonary metastases, with excellent local control. Further studies are warranted to elucidate which patients with pulmonary metastases would benefit from the local control with SABR and determine when to treat with systemic therapy due to quick progression of distant metastases.

Proceedings of the 97th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(P005) Ultrasensitive PSA Identifies Patients With Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Requiring Postop Radiotherapy
(P001) Disparities in the Local Management of Breast Cancer in the United States According to Health Insurance Status
(P002) Predictors of CNS Disease in Metastatic Melanoma: Desmoplastic Subtype Associated With Higher Risk
(P003) Identification of Somatic Mutations Using Fine Needle Aspiration: Correlation With Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
(P004) A Retrospective Study to Assess Disparities in the Utilization of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Proton Therapy (PT) in the Treatment of Prostate Cancer (PCa)
(S001) Tumor Control and Toxicity Outcomes for Head and Neck Cancer Patients Re-Treated With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)-A Fifteen-Year Experience
(S003) Weekly IGRT Volumetric Response Analysis as a Predictive Tool for Locoregional Control in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy 
(S004) Combination of Radiotherapy and Cetuximab for Aggressive, High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Cancer of the Head and Neck: A Propensity Score Analysis
(S005) Radiotherapy for Carcinoma of the Hypopharynx Over Five Decades: Experience at a Single Institution
(S002) Prognostic Value of Intraradiation Treatment FDG-PET Parameters in Locally Advanced Oropharyngeal Cancer
(P006) The Role of Sequential Imaging in Cervical Cancer Management
(P008) Pretreatment FDG Uptake of Nontarget Lung Tissue Correlates With Symptomatic Pneumonitis Following Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR)
(P009) Monte Carlo Dosimetry Evaluation of Lung Stereotactic Body Radiosurgery
(P010) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Treatment of Adrenal Gland Metastasis: Toxicity, Outcomes, and Patterns of Failure
(P011) Stereotactic Radiosurgery and BRAF Inhibitor Therapy for Melanoma Brain Metastases Is Associated With Increased Risk for Radiation Necrosis
Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight the many advantages to attending the 42nd Annual Miami Breast Cancer Conference, with some additional tidbits to round out the main event.
Other ongoing urothelial cancer trials are assessing enfortumab vedotin–based combinations in the neoadjuvant setting.
Given resource scarcity, developing practice strategies for resource-constrained settings would require aid from commercial and government stakeholders.
Approximately 95% of those with a complete response to enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab were alive after 2 years in the phase 3 EV-302 trial.
Thomas Powles, MBBS, MRCP, MD, highlighted fatigue, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy as toxicities observed with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
Updated findings from the phase 3 EV-302 trial show enduring responses and survival improvements with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Additional local, regional, or national policy may bolster access to screening for colorectal cancer, according to Aasma Shaukat, MD, MPH.
Related Content