Patient markers pinpoint response to bortezomib Rx

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 18 No 2
Volume 18
Issue 2

Australian researchers reported that multiple myeloma patients who expressed cyclin DI were more likely to achieve a response to treatment with bortezomib (Velcade). Mark A. Dawson, MD, Andrew Spenser, MD, and colleagues aimed to identify the patients who would fare best with bortezomib salvage therapy.

Australian researchers reported that multiple myeloma patients who expressed cyclin DI were more likely to achieve a response to treatment with bortezomib (Velcade). Mark A. Dawson, MD, Andrew Spenser, MD, and colleagues aimed to identify the patients who would fare best with bortezomib salvage therapy. Th eir group analyzed the baseline clinical variables, and profi led the baseline expression of a broad range of immunohistochemical markers of cell cycle activity, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, in a large cohort of multiple relapsed myeloma patients. The subjects had been recruited to prospective multicenter trials that assessed the effi cacy of bortezomib salvage therapy.

According to their results, complete or partial response to bortezomib salvage therapy was associated with a previous history of complete response to alternative antimyeloma treatment. Patients who achieved a response to bortezomib and those patients who expressed cyclin D1 at baseline showed a significant survival advantage. Patients who expressed FGFR3, a marker for poor prognosis, responded equally well and had similar outcomes with bortezomib, compared with FGFR3-negative patients.

On the other hand, patients who expressed p16INK4A, cytoplasmic p53, and the highest intensity of Bcl-2 staining had a poor response, they stated (Clinical Cancer Research 15:714-722, 2009).

“Bortezomib has off ered some patients with relapsed and refractory disease an opportunity for prolonged survival,” the authors wrote. “However, there remains a paucity of data in patients treated with bortezomib that accurately delineates and identifi es such patients. This information is crucial to guide management.” Baseline clinical variables, and selective immunohistochemical markers expressed by patients, may be used eff ectively to identify patients who are most likely to achieve a meaningful clinical response to bortezomib salvage therapy, they said.

The investigators are from several Australian institutions, including Alfred Hospital, Royal Melbourne Hospital, and Royal Adelaide Hospital Cancer Centre.

Recent Videos
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
The National ICE-T Conference may inspire future collaboration between community and academic oncologists in the management of different cancers.
Long-term toxicities like infections and secondary primary malignancies remain a concern when sequencing novel agents for those with multiple myeloma.
Management of adverse effects and access to cellular therapies among community oncologists represented key points of discussion in multiple myeloma.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
Related Content