Pembrolizumab Combo Exhibits Sustained Clinical Benefit in Advanced RCC

News
Article

Additional correlative data and further prospective clinical investigations are needed to inform biomarker-directed advanced RCC treatment.

Efficacy data from the trial revealed that the median overall survival among patients treated with the pembrolizumab combination was 47.2 months vs 40.8 months with sunitinib.

Efficacy data from the trial revealed that the median overall survival among patients treated with the pembrolizumab combination was 47.2 months vs 40.8 months with sunitinib.

The combination of pembrolizumab (Keytruda) and axitinib (Inlyta) displayed sustained clinical benefit vs sunitinib (Sutent) for the treatment of patients with advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), according to long-term efficacy and prespecified exploratory findings from the phase 3 MK-3475-426/KEYNOTE-426 (NCT02853331) published in Nature Medicine.1

Efficacy data from the trial revealed that the median overall survival (OS) among patients treated with the pembrolizumab combination was 47.2 months (95% CI, 43.6-54.8) vs 40.8 months (95% CI, 34.3-47.5) with sunitinib (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99). Additionally, the respective 36-, 48-, and 60-month OS rates were 62.6% vs 53.8%, 49.2% vs 45.0%, 41.9% vs 37.1%. Subgroup benefits included those younger than 65 years (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.59-0.92), female patients (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.88), and those with a poor International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk category (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.33-0.80).

The progression-free survival (PFS) in the investigational arm was 15.7 months (95% CI, 13.6-20.2) and 11.1 months (95% CI, 8.9-12.5) in the investigational arm (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59-0.81). The respective 36-, 48-, 60-month PFS rates were 29.2% vs 16.0%, 20.9% vs 11.9%, 18.3% vs 7.3%. Additionally, subgroup analysis showed benefit in those younger than 65 years (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.80), female patients (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90), those with an intermediate (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.88) or poor IMDC risk category (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.32-0.82), and those with a combined positive score (CPS) of 1 or greater (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53-0.82).

Regarding response data, the confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 60.6% in the investigational arm vs 39.6% in the control arm. Furthermore, the median duration of response (DOR) in the respective arms was 23.6 months (95% CI, 1.4+ to 68.6+) and 15.3 months (95% CI, 2.3-68.3). Additionally, the respective 36-, 48-, and 60-month DOR rates were 37.5% vs 29.0%, 28.4% vs 20.8%, and 26.0% vs 14.4%.

“In conclusion, results of the present analysis showed sustained OS, PFS, and ORR benefit of the use of pembrolizumab plus axitinib compared with sunitinib monotherapy. An extensive biomarker analysis adds to the increasing amount of information on biomarkers in patients treated with immunotherapy-based combinations,” Brian I. Rini, MD, professor of Medicine: Hematology and Oncology at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, TN, wrote in the publication with study coinvestigators.1 “Although the analysis showed potential clinical utility of some RNA signatures in identifying patients who are likely to benefit the most from each treatment, additional correlative data and further prospective clinical investigations are needed to inform biomarker-directed treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic RCC who are being considered for combination treatment with antiangiogenic and PD-1 inhibitor therapies.”

The phase 3 trial enrolled patients with newly diagnosed stage IV or recurrent ccRCC not previously treated for advanced disease. They were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive pembrolizumab at 200 mg once every 3 weeks for up to 35 cycles plus axitinib at 5 mg orally twice daily (n = 432) or sunitinib at 50 mg orally daily for 4 weeks on and 2 weeks off (n = 429). Treatment continued in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or the physician/patient decision to discontinue; in the combination arm, one drug could be continued if the other was discontinued due to toxicity.

Patients in the combination and control arms had a median age of 62.0 years (range, 30-89) vs 61.0 years (range, 26-90), were mostly male (71.3% vs 74.6%), and resided outside of North America or Western Europe (51.4% vs 51.7%). Most patients had IMDC intermediate disease (55.1% vs 57.3%), no sarcomatoid features (54.2% vs 55.7%), and a PD-L1 CPS of 1 or greater (56.3% vs 59.2%). The majority of patients had 2 or more organs with metastases (72.9% vs 77.2%), lung metastases (72.2% vs 72.0%), and previous nephrectomy (82.6% vs 83.4%).

The coprimary end points of the trial were OS and PFS per RECIST v1.1 criteria by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary end point was ORR per RECIST v1.1 criteria per BICR, and additional secondary end points included disease control rate, DOR, and safety.2

References

  1. Rini BI, Plimack ER, Stus V, et al. Pembrolizumab plus axitinib versus sunitinib for advanced clear cell renal cell carcinoma: 5-year survival and biomarker analyses of the phase 3 KEYNOTE-426 trial. Nat Med. Published online August 1, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41591-025-03867-5
  2. Study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in combination with axitinib versus sunitinib monotherapy in participants with renal cell carcinoma (MK-3475-426/​KEYNOTE-426). ClinicalTrials.gov. Updated November 18, 2024. Accessed August 21, 2025. https://tinyurl.com/25uu3hyr

Recent Videos
One of the largest obstacles to tackle in the kidney cancer landscape will be translating the research on rare kidney cancer subtypes into clinical trials.
Zanzalitinib exhibited favorable data when evaluated alone or in combination with anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibition in phase 1 RCC trials.
The investigational agent exhibited superior efficacy vs pembrolizumab in patients with lung cancer, suggesting potential efficacy in kidney cancer.
“As a community, if we’re looking to help enroll and advocate for patients with rare [kidney cancers], we need to be aware of what is out there,” said A. Ari Hakimi, MD.
Treatment with the dual inhibitor displayed a short half-life and a manageable toxicity profile in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
The annual Kidney Cancer Research Summit was born from congressional funding for kidney cancer research, according to KidneyCAN president Bryan Lewis.
Combining renal vaccines with immune therapy may better target tumor cells while limiting harm to healthy tissue, according to David A. Braun, MD, PhD.
Improving data collection and biomarker development across institutions may represent areas of expansion in kidney cancer research.
KIM-1 is a biomarker in the blood that may help noninvasively detect kidney cancer, according to Wenxin (Vincent) Xu, MD.
A phase 0 trial is seeking to assess the feasibility of aiding anti-cancer cells with cytokines to restore their function.
Related Content