Peritoneal Tumor Treatment Enhanced by Pre-PIPAC-MMC Small Incision Surgery

Commentary
Video

Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, it may confer benefits in the staging and treatment of peritoneal tumors.

Although small incision surgery may serve as a conduit to deliver mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC-MMC), there are multiple advantages to performing the procedure, according to Mustafa Raoof, MD, MS.

Raoof, assistant professor in the Division of Surgical Oncology in the Department of Surgery, and assistant professor in the Department of Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics City of Hope Cancer Center, in an interview with CancerNetwork®, spoke about the importance of conducting small incision surgery prior to treatment with PIPAC-MMC contextualized by a phase 1 dose-escalation trial (NCT04329494) evaluating mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy (PIPAC-MMC) in combination with systemic chemotherapy in patients with appendiceal and colorectal carcinomatosis he presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2025 Annual Meeting.

Raoof began by expressing that the surgical technique was primarily a conduit to deliver PIPAC-MMC, but that its inclusion in the treatment benefit confers multiple benefits. He first explained that performing the procedure allows access to the abdominal cavity via laparoscopy, which enables a more complete assessment of tumor location and characteristics than CT or PET scans alone.

Another advantage, according to Raoof, is that the surgical technique enables the collection of samples for biopsy, which enables an assessment of the effect of therapy in addition to a more accurate staging of disease. An additional advantage allows for the longitudinal assessment of tumor tissues to help iteratively develop more effective therapies.

Transcript:

The surgical technique is a ... conduit to deliver therapy, [but] there are [3] advantages to doing that in the operating room. One is that we have access to the abdominal cavity, so we can take a look at the peritoneum and stage how much cancer there is. One challenge with peritoneal metastases is that they are [quite] hard to image. On CT scans and PET scans, the entirety of the disease is not shown, and sometimes there can be smaller deposits below the resolution of the CT scan. When we do laparoscopy, we put a camera in the abdomen and take a look around, so we get a good estimate of where the disease is and what it looks like.

Then, in the same setting, we can deliver this therapy, and we also take biopsies in different areas, so we can study the effect of therapy on those biopsies in subsequent buybacks. It allows us to not only stage the disease but also sample and assess for response better.

Then the third advantage is that you can use this to develop better therapies. You can study the tumor tissues in a longitudinal way, in a patient model, to iteratively develop better therapies, which is a big advantage of this approach.

Reference

Raoof M. Dose escalation phase 1 trial of mitomycin C pressurized intraperitoneal aerosolized chemotherapy in combination with systemic chemotherapy for unresectable appendiceal and colorectal carcinomatosis. Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2025 Annual Meeting; March 27-29, 2025; Tampa, FL.

Recent Videos
Patients with node-negative disease who are older and have comorbidities may not be suitable to receive CDK4/6 inhibitors.
An observed carryover effect with CDK4/6 inhibitors may reduce the risk of recurrence years after a patient stops treatment.
Those being treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis may not have to experience the complication rates or prolonged recovery associated with surgical options.
For patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis, integrating PIPAC into a treatment regimen does not interrupt their systemic therapy.
According to Benjamin J. Golas, MD, PIPAC could be used as a bridging therapy before surgical debulking or between subsequent large surgical operations.
“If you have a [patient in the] fourth or fifth line, [JNJ-5322] could be a valid drug of choice,” said Rakesh Popat, BSc, MBBS, MRCP, FRCPath, PhD.
Earlier treatment with daratumumab may be better tolerated for patients with pretreated MRD-negative multiple myeloma.
The trispecific antibody JNJ-5322 demonstrated superior efficacy vs approved agents in multiple myeloma in results shared at the 2025 EHA Congress.
Despite CD19 CAR T-cell therapy exhibiting efficacy in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma, less than half achieve long-term remission.
Related Content