Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, Discusses Current Role of Pathology in RCC

Video

At the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, spoke about the role of pathology in renal cell carcinoma.

CancerNetwork® spoke with Peter Humphrey, MD, PhD, professor of pathology and director of Genitourinary Pathology at Yale School of Medicine in New Haven, Conneticut , about how community physicians treating patients with kidney cancer can best use pathology to help select therapy. Humphrey spoke about this topic at the 15th Annual Interdisciplinary Prostate Cancer Congress® and Other Genitourinary Malignancies, hosted by Physicians’ Education Resource®, LLC (PER®).

Transcript:

Things have changed, and now needle biopsies are being performed more often. A number of years ago, there used to be mostly nephrectomy cases and [they were] usually radical nephrectomies. Now, things have shifted a bit and we see many partial nephrectomies for kidney cancer, as well as needle biopsies for patients who are being considered for active surveillance, cryoablation, or local therapy. The type of tissue that we receive has changed. There are limitations for each, particularly for needle biopsies where classification and grading are good, but there are certain categories where there can be some challenges, especially with oncocytic renal neoplasms. That limitation is important to know. It’s good to know what the differential diagnosis might be when we’re confronted with this subset of renal cell neoplasms, like oncocytic tumors that might give us difficulty.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content