Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Responses in Gastroesophageal Cancer

Commentary
Video

Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.

Additional research and collaboration with other institutions may be necessary to further understand factors that influence how patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) gastroesophageal cancer respond to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, according to Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.

Shannon, a complex general surgical oncology fellow from Moffitt Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® about findings from a study she presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2024 Annual Meeting assessing the extent to which patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancers achieve pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

According to Shannon, the study’s population is too small to definitively determine what might be predictive of responses in this disease. She suggested that larger populations are necessary for potentially clarifying predictive factors of response.

Findings from the study presented at SSO highlighted that gastroesophageal cancers appear to respond to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, mirroring early clinical trial data.

Transcript:

When looking at all gastric cancers, there are limited studies, primarily in the translational medicine realm, that have looked at the tumor microenvironment. Essentially, when you have an increase in the CD8 cells demonstrating exhaustion of the immune response, that’s a poor prognostic factor, and those patients are less likely to respond to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. dMMR is [expressed in] 6% to 8% of gastric cancers, but truthfully, it’s quite rare. I don’t think that there’s much that we know at this stage that’s predictive—even within that small subsample—of who is going to respond. That’s something that is evolving and needs to be looked into.

It’s probably going to take collaborating with other institutions to try to get the numbers higher to really be able to understand what may is predictive and what’s not. But at this stage, our numbers are too small to be able to determine that but it’s something that probably needs to be looked into.

Reference

Shannon AB, Mehta RJ, Mok SR, et al. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in DNA mismatch repair protein-deficient gastroesophageal cancers. Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology 2024 Annual Meeting; March 20-24, 2024; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 94.

Recent Videos
Thomas Powles, MBBS, MRCP, MD, highlighted fatigue, nausea, and peripheral neuropathy as toxicities observed with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
Large international meetings may facilitate conversations regarding disparities of care outside of high-income countries.
Updated findings from the phase 3 EV-302 trial show enduring responses and survival improvements with enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab.
AI-powered tools may help alleviate doctor burnout and give clinicians more time to directly engage with patients.
Artificial intelligence may have the potential to enrich pathology practices to help identify aspects of tumor biology not seen with the human eye.
Efficacy results from the MASAI trial preceded the creation of the UK-funded EDITH trial, assessing 5 AI platforms in 700,000 women undergoing mammography.
Related Content