Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Responses in Gastroesophageal Cancer

Commentary
Video

Not much is currently known about the factors that may predict pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in this population, says Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.

Additional research and collaboration with other institutions may be necessary to further understand factors that influence how patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) gastroesophageal cancer respond to neoadjuvant immunotherapy, according to Adrienne Bruce Shannon, MD.

Shannon, a complex general surgical oncology fellow from Moffitt Cancer Center, spoke with CancerNetwork® about findings from a study she presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology (SSO) 2024 Annual Meeting assessing the extent to which patients with dMMR gastroesophageal cancers achieve pathologic responses to neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

According to Shannon, the study’s population is too small to definitively determine what might be predictive of responses in this disease. She suggested that larger populations are necessary for potentially clarifying predictive factors of response.

Findings from the study presented at SSO highlighted that gastroesophageal cancers appear to respond to neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, mirroring early clinical trial data.

Transcript:

When looking at all gastric cancers, there are limited studies, primarily in the translational medicine realm, that have looked at the tumor microenvironment. Essentially, when you have an increase in the CD8 cells demonstrating exhaustion of the immune response, that’s a poor prognostic factor, and those patients are less likely to respond to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. dMMR is [expressed in] 6% to 8% of gastric cancers, but truthfully, it’s quite rare. I don’t think that there’s much that we know at this stage that’s predictive—even within that small subsample—of who is going to respond. That’s something that is evolving and needs to be looked into.

It’s probably going to take collaborating with other institutions to try to get the numbers higher to really be able to understand what may is predictive and what’s not. But at this stage, our numbers are too small to be able to determine that but it’s something that probably needs to be looked into.

Reference

Shannon AB, Mehta RJ, Mok SR, et al. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in DNA mismatch repair protein-deficient gastroesophageal cancers. Presented at the Society of Surgical Oncology 2024 Annual Meeting; March 20-24, 2024; Atlanta, GA. Abstract 94.

Recent Videos
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 2025 ESMO Annual Congress, from hot topics and emerging trends to travel recommendations.
Andrezj Jakubowiak, MD, PhD, prioritizes KRd-based regimens for the treatment of high-risk newly diagnosed disease in the post-transplant setting.
A new clinical trial aims to offer a novel allogenic CAR T-cell product for patients with lymphoma closer to home.
Although a similar proportion achieved MRD negativity at the 10 to the –6 power, not enough studies have analyzed MRD at this level for multiple myeloma.
Determining the molecular characteristics of one’s disease may influence the therapy employed in the first line as well as subsequent settings.
Unique toxicities presented with talquetamab tend to get progressively better as the treatment course continues, according to Prerna Mewawalla, MD.
Modification of REMS programs may help patients travel back to community practices sooner, according to Suman Kambhampati, MD.
Symposiums and regional meetings may expand knowledge of how to adopt novel CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies, said Suman Kambhampati, MD.
Related Content