Removing Stage IV Primary May Cut Mortality

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 6
Volume 16
Issue 6

Removal of the primary breast tumor in patients with stage IV breast cancer was associated with significantly longer survival

WASHINGTON—Removal of the primary breast tumor in patients with stage IV breast cancer was associated with significantly longer survival, according to an analysis of the 1988-2003 Surveillance Epidemiologic End Results (SEER) data reported by Jennifer L. Gnerlich, MD, at the Society for Surgical Oncology (SSO) 60th Annual Meeting (abstract 54). Dr. Gnerlich is a surgical resident at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Senior author is Julie Margenthaler, MD, assistant professor of surgery at Washington University.

The retrospective, population-based cohort study compared survival of 9,734 women with stage IV breast cancer who underwent surgical excision of their primary tumor (n = 4,578) with survival of women who did not have surgery (n = 5,156).

Dr. Gnerlich reported that 24% of women who had surgery and 16% of women who did not have surgery were still alive at follow-up. After controlling for potential confounding variables and propensity scores, median survival was 36 months with surgery vs 21 months without surgery for those still alive at follow-up (P < .0001), and 18 vs 7 months for those who had died by the time of follow-up (P <. 0001).

The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death during follow-up was 0.63 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.66) for those patients who had surgery, indicating that the patients who underwent surgery were 37% less likely to die during the study period.

Dr. Gnerlich stressed that "this is a retrospective, population-based cohort study and should be interpreted with caution." Randomized prospective trials are necessary to further evaluate if women with stage IV breast cancer truly do have a survival advantage, she said, "and to determine which women with stage IV breast cancer will benefit most from surgery."

Recent Videos
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer. Antibody-drug conjugates are effective, but strategies such as better understanding the mechanisms of action may lead to enhanced care for patients with cancer.
ADCs demonstrate superior efficacy vs chemotherapy but maintain a similar efficacy profile that requires multidisciplinary collaboration to optimally treat.
According to Aditya Bardia, MD, MPH, FASCO, antibody-drug conjugates are slowly replacing chemotherapy as a standard treatment for breast cancer.
Administering oral SERD-based regimens may enhance patients’ quality of life when undergoing treatment for ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
Gedatolisib-based triplet regimens may be effective among patients with prior endocrine resistance or rapid progression following frontline therapy.
Leading experts in the breast cancer field highlight the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and other treatment modalities.
Related Content