Rituximab/CHOP Significantly Improves Outcomes in Advanced FL

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 16 No 2
Volume 16
Issue 2

Adding rituximab (Rituxan) to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) significantly improves the time to treatment failure and overall survival in elderly patients with previously untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL)

• ORLANDO—Adding rituximab (Rituxan) to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) significantly improves the time to treatment failure and overall survival in elderly patients with previously untreated advanced-stage follicular lymphoma (FL), according to the results of a prospective randomized trial presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Hematology (abstract 482).

"The addition of rituximab to CHOP was efficacious and had low side effects, suggesting that R-CHOP may offer doctors and patients a better option for treatment of this disease," said lead investigator Christian Buske, MD, of the Department of Medicine, Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Despite improvements in therapeutic regimens, FL remains incurable in its advanced stages. "Therefore our key challenge for the future is to develop treatment strategies to improve treatment outcome without adding major side effects," he said.

On behalf of his coinvestigators from the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group (GLSG), Dr. Buske presented data from the GLSG multicenter phase III, randomized controlled trial of CHOP vs R-CHOP.

The analysis focused on patients over age 60 with advanced-stage untreated FL who were randomized to CHOP alone (n = 112), or rituximab 375 mg/m2 plus CHOP (n = 109). Both groups received six to eight cycles of treatment.

The addition of rituximab to CHOP induced higher overall response rates and significantly prolonged the time to treatment failure (TTF), compared with CHOP alone, Dr. Buske reported. The median TTF for R-CHOP was 5.0 years vs 2.1 years for CHOP alone (P < .0001). The estimated 4-year progression-free survival was 62.2% for R-CHOP, compared with 27.9% for CHOP. Most important, he said, in these older patients, R-CHOP prolonged overall survival, with an estimated 4-year overall survival of 90% after R-CHOP vs 81% after CHOP alone (P = .039).

Recent Videos
A younger patient with AML who is more fit may be eligible for different treatments than an older patient with chronic medical conditions.
Breast cancer care providers make it a goal to manage the adverse effects that patients with breast cancer experience to minimize the burden of treatment.
Social workers and case managers may have access to institutional- or hospital-level grants that can reduce financial toxicity for patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Genetic backgrounds and ancestry may hold clues for better understanding pancreatic cancer, which may subsequently mitigate different disparities.
Factors like genetic mutations and smoking may represent red flags in pancreatic cancer detection, said Jose G. Trevino, II, MD, FACS.
Thomas Hope, MD, believes that an NRC initiative to update infiltration guidelines may organically address concerns that H.R. 2541 outlines.
Insurance and distance to a tertiary cancer center were 2 barriers to receiving high-quality breast cancer care, according to Rachel Greenup, MD, MPH.
4 experts are featured in this series.
4 experts are featured in this series.
Thomas Hope, MD, had not observed an adverse effect attributable to an infiltration across more than a decade of administering nuclear agents at UCSF.
Related Content