(S032) Value of Frequent Follow-Up Mammogram Schedule Following Breast-Conserving Surgery and Radiation Therapy

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

Our observations show a low incidence of BI-RADS 4 recommendations and a very low yield (0.8%) of cancer noted on pathology using a frequent follow-up mammogram schedule. We noted a trend of BI-RADS 4 returning positive for cancer in younger patients. This suggests that 6-month follow-up schedules are not necessary and that there may be value in defining risk-adaptive follow-up schedules after BCT.

C. Kaufman, L. Abramson, MD, T. Fulop, MD, S. Boolbol, MD, N. Nugent, A. Gillego, MD, M. Chadha, MD; Mount Sinai Beth Israel

OBJECTIVES: Obtaining more frequent follow-up mammograms in the first 2–3 years after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) is widely accepted. However, the clinical relevance of short-term follow-up mammograms in the overall management of breast cancer is unknown. The goal of our study was to evaluate the frequency of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4 recommendation in the short-term follow-up after BCT, and its correlation to pathology in all ipsilateral breast cancer cases.

METHODS: This is an institutional review board (IRB)-approved study. From 2001–2012, we identified 830 patients who underwent BCT and who had follow-up mammograms at our center. The total number of mammograms obtained within 40 months of BCT was 3,972 (median: 5 per patient). We studied the frequency of the BI-RADS 4 recommendation. We further studied the correlation of this radiologic finding with the pathology of additional biopsies for BI-RADS 4 lesions in the ipsilateral treated breast.

RESULTS: BI-RADS 1 to 3 was reported in 85% of patients. Among the 15% with reported BI-RADS 4 recommendations, 8.8% (n = 73) were noted in the ipsilateral breast. Median time to a BI-RADS 4 result in the ipsilateral treated breast was 11.6 months vs 17.3 months in the contralateral breast (P = .0248). In the correlation of BI-RADS 4 with additional biopsy from the ipsilateral breast, 3 patients had no biopsy, 63 patients (7.5%) had a benign biopsy, and in 7 patients (0.8%), the biopsy was positive for cancer. Patients with a positive biopsy were younger (median age: 44 yr) than those with benign findings (median age: 56 yr) (P = .0667).

CONCLUSIONS: Our observations show a low incidence of BI-RADS 4 recommendations and a very low yield (0.8%) of cancer noted on pathology using a frequent follow-up mammogram schedule. We noted a trend of BI-RADS 4 returning positive for cancer in younger patients. This suggests that 6-month follow-up schedules are not necessary and that there may be value in defining risk-adaptive follow-up schedules after BCT.

Acknowledgment:The authors gratefully acknowledge grant support from the Ellen Blair Fund.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society - americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Opportunities to further reduce relapses include pembrolizumab-based combination therapy and evaluating the agent’s contribution before and after surgery.
For patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers, the current standard of care for curative therapy has a cure rate of less than 50%.
According to Maurie Markman, MD, patient-reported outcomes pertain to more relevant questions surrounding the impact of therapy for patients.
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
Related Content