(S050) Stereotactic Radiosurgery in the Setting of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Results in Improved Intracranial Control Compared With Whole-Brain Irradiation for Greater Than Three Melanoma Brain Metastases

Publication
Article
OncologyOncology Vol 30 No 4_Suppl_1
Volume 30
Issue 4_Suppl_1

SRS, in the setting of systemic immunotherapy, may provide improved intracranial control compared with WBRT in patients with ≥ 3 melanoma brain metastases. Future prospective studies may expand the utility of SRS and spare selective patients with large intracranial disease burdens from toxicities associated with WBRT.

Penny Fang, MD, Wen Jiang, MD, Betty Y. Kim, MD, PhD, Isabella C. Glitza, MD, PhD, Anita Mahajan, MD, Michael A. Davies, MD, PhD, Franco DeMonte, MD, Patrick Hwu, MD, Erik P. Sulman, MD, PhD, Paul D. Brown, MD, Jing Li, MD, PhD; UT MD Anderson Cancer Center; Mayo Clinic Jacksonville

BACKGROUND: Whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is a commonly accepted treatment of choice for patients with ≥ 3 brain metastases, because of concern about intracranial microscopic disease. With increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic cancers, several studies have suggested that improved intracranial control by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is also achievable. We investigated whether SRS, combined with cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blockade, can result in superior intracranial control compared with WBRT alone in patients with ≥ 3 melanoma brain metastases.

METHODS: From 2007 to 2014, patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma who received ipilimumab (Ipi) and SRS for new brain metastases after the initiation of immunotherapy were identified. Only patients treated with ≥ 3 lesions were included. A matching cohort of patients who received WBRT without prior immunotherapies was identified and compared.

RESULTS: A total of 59 patients with metastatic melanoma were included in the study; 22 were treated with SRS + Ipi and 37 with WBRT alone. Patients received at least two doses prior to SRS. The majority of the patients (86.4%) received SRS within 5 months from the last Ipi treatment. The median number of treated brain metastases was 6 for SRS + Ipi (range: 4–22) and 7 (range: 4–25) for WBRT. Patients treated with SRS + Ipi had significantly improved intracranial control compared with WBRT alone, with a 12-month intracranial progression-free rate of 26% vs 13% (P = .028). There was a trend toward improved overall survival (OS) for patients who received SRS + Ipi (median: 9.61 mo vs 4.47 mo; P = .09). The improved intracranial control for SRS + Ipi remained significant on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS: SRS, in the setting of systemic immunotherapy, may provide improved intracranial control compared with WBRT in patients with ≥ 3 melanoma brain metastases. Future prospective studies may expand the utility of SRS and spare selective patients with large intracranial disease burdens from toxicities associated with WBRT.

Proceedings of the 98th Annual Meeting of the American Radium Society -americanradiumsociety.org

Articles in this issue

(S002) A 15-Year Review of Radiation Therapy for Keloids at Two Institutions
(S003) Single-Fraction Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma Bony Metastases Provides Pain Control and Decreases Time to Chemotherapy
(S001) Prognostic Value of Pretreatment Serum Inflammatory Markers in Patients Receiving Radiation Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer
(S004) Trend in Second Malignancy Risk for Head and Neck Cancer With Increased Utilization of IMRT: Analysis of SEER Database
(S005) Comparison of Legal Needs of a Group of Patients With Cancer: Economic and Geographic Factors
(S006) Mission Improvement: Lessons From Initiating a Resident-Led Quality Improvement Project on Smoking Cessation at a County Hospital
(S007) Results of a Phase II Trial Using Cetuximab Plus Docetaxel With Low-Dose Fractionated Radiation for Recurrent Unresectable Locally Advanced Head and Neck Carcinoma
(S008) The Effect of Simulation and Treatment Delays for Patients With Oropharyngeal Cancer Receiving Definitive Radiation Therapy in the Era of Risk Stratification Using Smoking and Human Papilloma Virus Status
(S009) Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy With Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Boost for Unfavorable Prostate Cancer: A Report on Three-Year Toxicity
(S011) Comparative Study Between Ileal Conduit and Indiana Pouch After Cystectomy for Patients With Carcinoma of Urinary Bladder
(S010) Computed Tomography–Assessed Measures of Bone Mineral Density and Muscle Mass as Predictors of Survival in Men With Prostate Cancer
(S012) Quantitative Imaging to Evaluate the Malignant Potential of Pancreatic Cysts
(S013) Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
(S014) The Impact of Radiation Therapy on Survival in Surgically Resected, High-Risk Patients With Ampullary Adenocarcinoma: A Population-Based Analysis
(S016) The Impact of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy on Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
Recent Videos
Once a patient-specific dose is determined, an all-oral combination of revumenib plus decitabine/cedazuridine and venetoclax may be “very good” in AML.
Co-hosts Kristie L. Kahl and Andrew Svonavec highlight what to look forward to at the 67th Annual ASH Meeting in Orlando.
Patients with mediastinal lymph node involved-lung cancer may benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting.
Stressing the importance of prompt AE disclosure before they become severe can ensure that a patient can still undergo resection with curative intent.
Thomas Marron, MD, PhD, presented a session on clinical data that established standards of care for stage II and III lung cancer treatment at CFS 2025.
Sonia Jain, PhD, stated that depatuxizumab mafodotin, ABBV-221, and ABBV-321 were 3 of the most prominent ADCs in EGFR-amplified glioblastoma.
Skin toxicities are common with targeted therapies for GI malignancies but can be remedied by preventative measures and a collaboration with dermatology.
Computational models help researchers anticipate how ADCs may behave in later lines of development, while they are still in the early stages.
ADC payloads with high levels of potency can sometimes lead to higher levels of toxicity, which can eliminate the therapeutic window for patients with cancer.
Related Content