Saad Z. Usmani, MD, MBA, FACP, Talks About Durable and Deep Responses of Cilta-Cel for Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Video

Usmani noted the strong overall response and stringent complete response rates observed with ciltacabtagene autoleucel for multiple myeloma at a median follow-up of 18 months.

At the 2021 European Hematology Association (EHA) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Saad Z. Usmani, MD, MBA, FACP, of the Levine Cancer Institute in Charlotte, North Carolina, about his main takeaway from the CARTITUDE-1 trial, citing durable and deep responses experienced by patients with multiple myeloma who were treated with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel).

Transcription:

The main takeaway is that at a longer median follow-up of 18 months, cilta-cel appears to be very active. It’s leading to early deep and durable responses in heavily pretreated [patients with myeloma] with an overall response rate of 98% [and a] stringent CR rate of 80%. In the evaluable patients for [minimal residual disease (MRD)] negativity by [next-generation sequencing] at 10-5, 92% were MRD negative. [There was an] 18-month [progression-free survival rate] of 66% and [overall survival] rate of 81%. [These were] very impressive results in a heavily pretreated patient population. We look forward to getting more data in different settings within myeloma, including earlier relapse and frontline.

Reference

Weisel K, Martin T, Krishnan A, et al. Comparison of Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel (Cilta-cel) in CARTITUDE-1 Versus Standard of Care in Triple-Class Exposed Multiple Myeloma Patients in Clinical Trials of Daratumumab. Presented at: 2021 European Hematologic Association Congress; Virtual. June 9-17, 2021. Abstract EP977.

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content