Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, Discussed the Wee1 Inhibitor Adavosertib for PARPi-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting to talk about the use of adavosertib in PARP inhibitor–resistant ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, about efficacy with the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib observed in the phase 2 EFFORT trial (NCT03579316). In a patient population with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy, the agent showed a 23% overall response rate. Toxicity led to dose interruptions in most patients, but grade 3/4 adverse effects were considered to be manageable.

Here, Westin discusses how these data may be of use to the multidisciplinary team.

Transcript:

Similar to what we’ve seen with other combination strategies, it really is important to engage the patient, your pharmacist, and your nursing staff to make sure that everybody’s aware of the potential [adverse] effects and set expectations to really make sure patients know we may start on 1 dose, but there may be a need to hold and to reduce as needed to make this tolerable for you. I think that would be the major thing.

Now as far as where this is going. Scientifically, this is very exciting that clinically we’re seeing the benefit we need, but it’s not quite ready for primetime. We need to do a little bit more study before it’s going to be [in] the hands of clinicians out in practice.

References

Westin SN, Coleman RL, Fellman BM, et al. EFFORT: EFFicacy Of adavosertib in parp ResisTance: A randomized two-arm non-comparative phase II study of adavosertib with or without olaparib in women with PARP-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):5505. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5505

Recent Videos
Findings from David Rimm, MD, PhD, suggest that there may be an inverse relationship between HER2 and TROP2 expression among patients with breast cancer.
Tissue samples collected from patients with breast cancer during treatment may help explore therapy selection and predict toxicities.
The mechanism of CTO1681 may allow it to reduce the production of a broad range of proinflammatory cytokines in DLBCL.
Younger and fitter patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma were more likely to receive bispecific antibodies in community oncology settings.
Mechanistic treatment benefits were observed in the phase 2 STEM trial for patients with multiple myeloma.
Data from a retrospective cohort study showed that one-fifth of patients with multiple myeloma received bispecific antibodies in rural community settings.
Being able to treat patients with cevostamab who have multiple myeloma after 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy vs 4 lines may allow for better outcomes.
Using the monitoring of symptoms and quality of life platform may provide a quick and efficient system for patients to submit outcome data.
Although a greater risk of CNS relapse may emerge with immunotherapy-based backbones, toxicities associated with chemotherapy are avoided.
Related Content