Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, Discussed the Wee1 Inhibitor Adavosertib for PARPi-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Video

CancerNetwork® sat down with Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, at the 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting to talk about the use of adavosertib in PARP inhibitor–resistant ovarian cancer.

At the 2021 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting, CancerNetwork® spoke with Shannon N. Westin, MD, MPH, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, about efficacy with the Wee1 inhibitor adavosertib observed in the phase 2 EFFORT trial (NCT03579316). In a patient population with a median of 4 prior lines of therapy, the agent showed a 23% overall response rate. Toxicity led to dose interruptions in most patients, but grade 3/4 adverse effects were considered to be manageable.

Here, Westin discusses how these data may be of use to the multidisciplinary team.

Transcript:

Similar to what we’ve seen with other combination strategies, it really is important to engage the patient, your pharmacist, and your nursing staff to make sure that everybody’s aware of the potential [adverse] effects and set expectations to really make sure patients know we may start on 1 dose, but there may be a need to hold and to reduce as needed to make this tolerable for you. I think that would be the major thing.

Now as far as where this is going. Scientifically, this is very exciting that clinically we’re seeing the benefit we need, but it’s not quite ready for primetime. We need to do a little bit more study before it’s going to be [in] the hands of clinicians out in practice.

References

Westin SN, Coleman RL, Fellman BM, et al. EFFORT: EFFicacy Of adavosertib in parp ResisTance: A randomized two-arm non-comparative phase II study of adavosertib with or without olaparib in women with PARP-resistant ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(suppl 15):5505. doi:10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.5505

Recent Videos
A third of patients had a response [to lifileucel], and of the patients who have a response, half of them were alive at the 4-year follow-up.
We are seeing that, in those patients who have relapsed/refractory melanoma with survival measured as a few weeks and no effective treatments, about a third of these patients will have a response.
We have the current CAR [T-cell therapies], which target CD19; however, we need others.
“Every patient [with multiple myeloma] should be offered CAR T before they’re offered a bispecific, with some rare exceptions,” said Barry Paul, MD.
Barry Paul, MD, listed cilta-cel, anito-cel, and arlo-cel as 3 of the CAR T-cell therapies with the most promising efficacy in patients with multiple myeloma.
Jose Sandoval Sus, MD, discussed standard CAR T-cell therapies in patients across multiple high-risk lymphoma indications.
Elucidating nonresponses to bispecific T-cell engagers may be an important research consideration in the multiple myeloma field.
Barriers to access and financial toxicities are challenges that must be addressed for CAR T-cell therapies in LBCL, according to Jose Sandoval Sus, MD.
Fixed treatment durations with bispecific antibodies followed by observation may help in mitigating infection-related AEs, according to Shebli Atrash, MD.
Shebli Atrash, MD, stated that MRD should be considered carefully as an end point, given potential recurrence despite MRD negativity.
Related Content