Should IMRT Be the New Standard in Esophageal Cancer?

Video

This video discusses the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy and whether it should be the new standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer.

Most esophageal cancer patients have distal tumors, resulting in vital organs such as the heart and lungs being exposed to substantial doses of radiation therapy.

In this video, Steven H. Lin, MD, PhD, of the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, discusses the use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and whether it should be the new standard for treating patients with esophageal cancer.

IMRT is more advanced, but more costly, than standard 3D radiation.

Recent Videos
According to Benjamin Golas, MD, PIPAC is emerging as minimally invasive laparoscopic approach for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis.
According to Ronan J. Kelly, deciding whether to give nivolumab- or durvalumab-based regimens in gastric cancers may rely on a patient’s frailty.
Five-year follow-up revealed that patients treated with nivolumab vs placebo in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial experienced a “doubling” of survival.
Patients treated with nivolumab in the phase 3 CheckMate 577 trial were less likely to experience progression-related treatment discontinuation vs placebo.
Testing a patient’s genetics may influence decisions such as using longer courses of radiotherapy, says Rachit Kumar, MD.
Spatial transcriptomics and multiplex immunohistochemistry from samples may elucidate outcomes for patients who undergo surgical care for cancer.
Future work may focus on optimizing symptom management associated with percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy placement in malignant bowel obstructions.
Post-operative length of stay ranged from 4 to 9 days for patients who underwent percutaneous transesophageal gastrostomy for malignant bowel obstructions.
Related Content