Standardized chemoembolization boosts HCC survival

Publication
Article
Oncology NEWS InternationalOncology NEWS International Vol 17 No 12
Volume 17
Issue 12

CHICAGO-Results from the largest and longest trial of its kind suggest that patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinomas who undergo systematic treatment with three chemotherapeutic agents and arterial embolization plus imaging follow-up have better survival rates than those who undergo nonstandardized chemoembolization regimes.

CHICAGO-Results from the largest and longest trial of its kind suggest that patients with intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinomas who undergo systematic treatment with three chemotherapeutic agents and arterial embolization plus imaging follow-up have better survival rates than those who undergo nonstandardized chemoembolization regimes.

That was the message delivered at RSNA 2008 by principal investigator Eleni Liapi, MD, an interventional radiologist at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore (abstract SSA23-01).

The treatment of patients with nonresectable liver malignancies using transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has achieved widespread popularity worldwide. The type of drug and treatment management protocols used, however, can also be just as diverse.

Th is lack of standardized TACE protocols could significantly aff ect treatment outcomes, according to Dr. Liapi.

Retrospectively from 1996 to 2000 and prospectively from 2001 to 2007, Dr. Liapi and colleagues enrolled 347 patients with unresectable HCC who were 65.6 years old on average. All patients underwent a standardized protocol including MRI and/or CT at baseline; an average of three TACE sessions spaced out by about 80 days; and clinical, biochemical, and imaging evaluations before each TACE session. Finally, imaging follow-up was done.

The TACE protocol included doxorubicin, cisplatin, and mitomycin-C mixed with lipiodol followed by embolization with polyvinyl alcohol or microspheres, avoiding complete vessel occlusion. Researchers evaluated disease status before and aft er treatment and measured tumor size using RECIST.

The investigators found that patients who completed the standardized treatment and follow-up protocol had stable liver disease and effective tumor control. In addition, these patients achieved average survival rates of nearly two years.

“Achieving 20 months median survival in a population that had 3% to 4% vascular invasion is commendable and quite a bit different from a lot of the other reports on survival from patients who have vascular invasion,” commented session chair  William S. Rilling, MD.

TACE has already been proven as an eff ective treatment for patients with unresectable HCC, according to Dr. Liapi. But the comprehensive standardized protocol used at Hopkins for over a decade has been shown to bolster its effectiveness. Controlled randomized studies comparing different protocols would be ideal to validate the best treatment.

These are hard to come by, however, mostly due to ethical considerations, Dr. Liapi said.

“Right now, we are at the stage that we cannot perform that. So our best bet would be to just present as many patients as we can and show how these patients did over time,” she said.

Recent Videos
Future findings from a translational analysis of the OVATION-2 trial may corroborate prior clinical data with IMNN-001 in advanced ovarian cancer.
The dual high-affinity binding observed with ISB 2001 may avoid resistance mechanisms reported with other BCMA-targeted therapies.
The use of chemotherapy trended towards improved recurrence-free intervals in older patients with high-risk tumors as determined via the MammaPrint assay.
Use of a pharmacist-directed resource appears to improve provider confidence and adverse effect monitoring for patients undergoing infusion therapy.
Reshma L. Mahtani, DO, describes how updates from the DESTINY-Breast09, ASCENT-04, and VERITAC-2 trials may shift practices in the breast cancer field.
2 experts in this video
Related Content